for Gally

A well laid out site, easy to navigate and there's not a lot that goes on at BFC that doesn't appear on this site and for that we must thank Gally and other admin staff.

However there are still posts which to my mind should be removed.

1) I a recent post a former member of the Royal family described as a w****. I reported that post - it's still there.

2) Yesterday a (libellous?) thread started implying the father of missing child had a murky sexual past - thread still there.

3) Hemsworth Tyke raise an issue which concerned him a lot with Admin - his post still there.

4) I found the poll asking whether or not owner Cryne was doing a good job a bit disrespectful and should not have been on this site.

Of course others may disagree with me - one man's meat is another man's poison.

I think Admin have to be very clear what they see as acceptable and what isn't. The best way for them to 'police' this site is to encourage posters to use the 'Report' facility and Admin should respond to the 'Reports.'

Gally, thanks

 

The poll was 'do you want Patrick Cryne to leave?'

A fairly reasonable topic to discuss, considering he's said he's leaving. I felt it would be good to see what folk on here thought. That perhaps after seeing that over 80% of the forum wanted him to remain, that he'd cheer the **** up.


Not sure I think there's owt valid in your other posts you want removing either.


Be like North Korea on here soon.

 

I'd personally describe all the Royal family as w***ers.

 

I like Jim. My arse and that. And Dave was funny, always looked/sounded like he'd had a few too many brain cell killing drugs though.

 

Never thought id see the day but I agree with you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Christ i havent even made this list! seeing as im public enemy No.1 today im a little upset

 

when i came on here a while back to have a bit of a whinge, i thought DrZ was ok and agreed with a lot of what he posted. it seems a bit harsh to make it a permanent ban this time.

 

Did it work?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

He seemed cheery last night on facebook.

 

The two persons the reeve and doc got 2nd chances and they both would comment on almost every thread banging on about negitivite crap good riddence the doc did seem okay actually but the reeve had been asking for it a while although it was all a big wind up with him I feel

 

1. What is the censored word? I can't think of any with that amount of letters beginning with W

2. Nothing libellous to bring up a FACT

3. What do you suggest should have been the outcome of hemsworth tykes unfounded complaint?

4. If a discussion on whether the football club who's name is in the very title of this discussion forum can't be discussed on here then what can?

 

One question. Have you ever kissed a girl?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

As usual ST you're looking for an argument for the sake of an argument. For that reason I'm not bothering responding to your questions.

As a regular user I was just pointing out to Gally that there were in my opinion some posts which should be deleted.

Were you to post a similar message where you voice concerns I wouldn't see it my place to agree or disagree with you. I would respect your view.

 

Still think 'do you want Patrick Cryne to leave?' was ill judged. Do I want it censored? Well, that's a different question. In fact that itself brings up a whole load of other questions. Think I'd have preferred Whitey to have shown better judgement himself on that one. Only my opinion, of course.

 

Not looking for an argument, I wanted your views.

By the way I was mistaken in saying child sex history, I meant child abuse history which covers more than sex

 

double post - don't want to be accused of repeating myself.

 

Are we not allowed an opinion on the sponging royal family?

 

So they should be removed because you find them inappropriate - what if everyone else finds them acceptable?

Should anyone view themselves as the self appointed moral compass of the board?