Barnsley FC named in a list of shame.

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by Donny Red, Nov 24, 2017.

  1. Donny Red

    Donny Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2016
    Messages:
    8,216
    Likes Received:
    7,042
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired.
    Location:
    Ossett.
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    According to today's Daily Mirror as at August 7th, Barnsley FC have been listed as being one of
    the top ten Clubs in England and Wales with the most Football banning orders.
    In first place and for three years on the trot are Newcastle United with 111.
    Second : Wolves 75, Third : West Ham 57, Fourth: Millwall 55, Fifth: Manchester Utd 49, Sixth: Liverpool 44,
    Seventh: Barnsley 43, Eighth: Chelsea 42, Ninth: Birmingham City 41 and joint Tenth: Burnley/ Bristol City and Bristol Rovers all with 39.
     
    Donny Red, Nov 24, 2017
    #1
    Young Nudger likes this.
  2. North Yorks Red

    North Yorks Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    15,316
    Likes Received:
    12,553
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Harrogate
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Nudger will be well chuffed :p
     
    North Yorks Red, Nov 24, 2017
    #2
  3. John Peachy

    John Peachy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    16,790
    Likes Received:
    16,091
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    The littlest hobo
    Location:
    Leeds, United Kingdom
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    we do have more than our fair share of morons
     
    John Peachy, Nov 24, 2017
    #3
    Dodgy Back Tyke and Kettlewell like this.
  4. Carlycu5tard

    Carlycu5tard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    947
    Likes Received:
    358
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Wombwell
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)

    If you flip the statistic to Bans per average attendee - I bet we are top -

    Newcastle 51,000 - just just over 2 bans per 1000 fans.
    Wolves attendance 28,000 so roughly 3 bans per 1000 fans.
    West ham 56,000 fans - 1 ban per thousand fans.
    Millwall - 55 with 12,000 fans 4.5 bans per thousand fans (no suprise there)
    Manchester United 75,000 fans - 2/3rds of a ban per thousand fans - quite the goody two shoes the prawn sandwich munchers
    Liverpool 53,000 - 0.8 bans per thousand fans
    Barnsley 11,000 attendees so rouhly 4 bans per 1000 fans.
    Chelsea 43,000 fans - so one ban per thousand fans
    Bristol Rovers also about 4 with 9,000 fans.


    So in terms of the highest proportion of nasty fan's we're second. after millwall. Something to think about.
     
    Carlycu5tard, Nov 24, 2017
    #4
    MarioKempes and Kettlewell like this.
  5. Ext

    Extremely Northern Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    11,753
    Likes Received:
    1,949
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Professional Northerner.
    Location:
    Preparing for the 4th division
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    How many were handed down after that shambles at Port Vale ?
     
    Extremely Northern, Nov 24, 2017
    #5
  6. Mrs

    MrsHallsToffeerolls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2007
    Messages:
    27,003
    Likes Received:
    5,617
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    How many banned from attending and then the cases against them didn`t get to court?
     
    MrsHallsToffeerolls, Nov 24, 2017
    #6
  7. red

    redrum Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    22,431
    Likes Received:
    16,237
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)

    Millwall don't usually get 12k home fans
     
    redrum, Nov 24, 2017
    #7
  8. wak

    wakeyred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    8,992
    Likes Received:
    7,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    the clues in my imaginative online moniker
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I reckon most are away day morons, no point in looking at home attendances, in my experience there's a huge concentration of f**k wits on away games.
     
    wakeyred, Nov 24, 2017
    #8
    fitzytyke2 likes this.
  9. Young Nudger

    Young Nudger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    14,466
    Likes Received:
    3,095
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Counting great crested newts
    Location:
    Hiding in a reed bed at the local RSPB nature rese
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I don't go away often.
    But over recent years I have noticed that if there's 400 away fans then on the face of it about 300 look and sound like they could cause problems.
    So these figures are no surprise.

    Question is - where are these fans at home games because I don't see many in TARN before a match - especially since Yorkshireman was demolished.
     
    Young Nudger, Nov 24, 2017
    #9
  10. MappRed

    MappRed Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2017
    Messages:
    1,805
    Likes Received:
    1,642
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    We’ve been to many an away game and walked into the ground behind a group of hammered fans and thought “I hope we’re not sat near that lot.” At Charlton away a few years ago we were unfortunately in the mixer and the guy in front spent 90 minutes being abusive and following through. Horrendous.
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2017
    MappRed, Nov 24, 2017
    #10
    fitzytyke2 likes this.
  11. Exi

    Exile Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Messages:
    5,756
    Likes Received:
    6,560
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Behind the headlines above I'd suggest that our club is doing a relatively good job, especially when compared to certain others.

    The number of our 'supporters' arrested over the last three years has been falling (42 in 2014/15, 35 in 2015/16 and 28* in 2016/17) but the number of banning orders has been rising (7 in 2014/15, 13 in 2015/16 and 22 in 2016/17) to the point where we are one of the clubs with the most banning orders per number of arrests.

    The message being that if you are arrested and convicted of a football related offence following BFC, then you'll be banned - which is positive as far as I am concerned and seems to be bearing fruit in the lessening arrest numbers. It contrasts starkly with tomorrow's opponents who have had 129 arrests over the last two years but have only seen fit to ban a paltry 14.

    * - Of the 28 arrested in 2016/17, 15 were at home, 12 away and 1 by the BTP. 3 were for violent disorder, 13 for public disorder, 1 for throwing missiles, 3 for pitch incursion, 5 alcohol offences, 1 for possession of pyrotechnic, 1 for breach of banning order and 1 for criminal damage. (From this I am disappointed to learn that Mike Dean was not arrested for impersonating a referee :D).

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...2016-to-2017-season#football-banning-orders-1
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2017
    Exile, Nov 24, 2017
    #11
    wakeyred likes this.
  12. Carlycu5tard

    Carlycu5tard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    947
    Likes Received:
    358
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Wombwell
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Carlycu5tard, Nov 24, 2017
    #12
  13. red

    redrum Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    22,431
    Likes Received:
    16,237
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    redrum, Nov 24, 2017
    #13
  14. Eas

    East Grinstead Tyke Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Occupation:
    PR person
    Location:
    East Grinstead, apparently
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    We only get **** magistrates.
     
    East Grinstead Tyke, Nov 24, 2017
    #14
  15. Exi

    Exile Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Messages:
    5,756
    Likes Received:
    6,560
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Uriah Rennie :D
     
    Exile, Nov 24, 2017
    #15
  16. DEETEE

    DEETEE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    10,230
    Likes Received:
    2,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    You do realise that the banning orders refer to civil banning orders that are not criminal convictions.

    The plod do not even need much of a reason to issue one, ironically v Leeds one lad got a 3 year ban for making a ****** sign..

    And they get 'paid' for every ban issued.
     
    DEETEE, Nov 24, 2017
    #16
  17. Brush

    Brush Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    15,417
    Likes Received:
    14,022
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Ex-IT professional
    Location:
    Swadlincote, South Derbyshire
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    This clearly shows that the data is flawed....
     
    Brush, Nov 25, 2017
    #17
  18. bra

    bradgatetyke Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2017
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    182
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Bradgate Rotherham
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Couldn't he have argued fair comment?
     
    bradgatetyke, Nov 25, 2017
    #18
  19. DEETEE

    DEETEE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    10,230
    Likes Received:
    2,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    At a minimum of 2k a day costs hes liable for regardless of outcome?

    **** that.
     
    DEETEE, Nov 25, 2017
    #19

Share This Page