Etiquette

Steal his car keys and park his car round the corner for bants.

Then set him on fire.

 

It's a season ticket - it can be used over the whole season. Hence it's lending.

He should have given it back.

If it was me I would have offered to give it back the second that I knew your other plans had fallen through.

 

He should give it back - I'm surprised anyone could think otherwise. I certainly won't be lending anything to some of the posters on here.

 

Me too, but the thing is he wont give it back, and the whole point now is that woteva you me or anybody else says it falls into the fact that it was given as a gift. the recipient the bloke who he gave it to, its now his property.

 

Just go round to his,knock ont duwer n seh, giz mi ticket back or al smash thi fkin face in

 

Just give him the ticket back

 

Also this is just wrong. He clearly lent it to him, unless you're saying his mate is entitled to keep it and use it for the rest of the season...?

 

I think he'll give it back once hes used Reading. But unfortuneately the law will side with the rcipitant.

 

Can I borrow your car Winkbarn. Oh and your house. I promise I'll give them back to you. ;-)

 

So the recipient gets to watch the rest of this season's matches? You're off your trolley mate.

 

I,ve not said he can watch the remainder of the games, all i've done is told someone that if the bloke refuses to give the ticket back, then the situation is hes got a bit of a problem. How it evolves from now on i could'nt and would'nt want to say. But from whats been said if you care to read all the posts then the recipient is in the right.

 

Mario you know, i dont lend or borrow, if i aint got it i dont want it if i dont have it i dont want it.

 

Did you get the tickets for Sunderland sorted?

 

He'd be legally obliged to return it, no way the law would side with him at all. It's a bit less clear but I also think he would legally be obliged to return it now, but would possibly be able to claim any costs he has incurred in reliance on the use of the ticket.

 

I don't agree with you (or the recipient). You incorrectly assumed I'd not read the thread.

 

Sorted.

 

Ok its all about taking part and debating, ive told someone wot i know as fact, wot happens now is out of my hands good luck and remember the word COLLATERALL. Good luck and hes not a mate.

 

Shag his wife while hes at the game.

At least one of you will be guarenteed a happy end to the afternoon!

 

I think you're mixing up collateral and consideration. Lack of consideration is the reason why, in a formal dispute, the recipient would be limited to pleading a case based on promissory estoppel and likely be limited to recovering damages based upon his detrimental reliance.

 

I think seen as the ticket is actually non transferable then I'd say it can't be his property. Yes the guy giving it didn't have the right to do it either so they are both technically in the wrong.