Confused ...please help.....

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by Tekkytyke, Apr 22, 2018.

  1. Tek

    Tekkytyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    7,369
    Likes Received:
    4,609
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Italy
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    .We have posters on here constantly complaining about Morais tactics, setup, and team selections and at the same time highlighting the individual errors that have caused us to concede goals and at the other end miss good chances and 'sitters'.
    If the tactics are such that we have created chances that we should have put away, and, lets face it, most games have been lost by a single goal, how can you blame anyone other than the players on the field. Since Morais came they HAVE actually scored in open play, something that was a dim and distant memory towards the end of Hecky's tenure.
    To reiterate, all you armchair 'experts' are blaming Morais tactics when , by your own argument, 'missed chances', 'goalkeeping errors' etc. clearly point to players being at fault NOT management.
     
    Bossman, ScubaTyke and TitusMagee like this.
  2. Jimmy viz

    Jimmy viz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Messages:
    28,391
    Likes Received:
    17,604
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballet Dancer
    Location:
    Hiding under the bed
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Both are ***** is my no scientific opinion.
     
    occook likes this.
  3. Exi

    Exile Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Messages:
    5,763
    Likes Received:
    6,577
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley
    But many posters also can only deal with binary choices when there at least three things ALL at play:-

    1) Yes some of the players are sh!te, not good enough, call them what you will, and make baby errors; AND
    2) Morais' team selections, tactics, formations, rotations, permutations, substitutions are illogical, baffling and downright mental at times, meaning that the best is not obtained even from this very limited group; AND
    3) Morais picks some of those afore-mentioned sh!te players even when he doesn't have to, Mills over Pinnock for example yesterday.

    Therefore on two out three counts ALL of which are contributing to our downfall, Morais is culpable.

    He isn't culpable for the wholesale downgrading of the playing strength from last January onwards.
     
  4. Tek

    Tekkytyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    7,369
    Likes Received:
    4,609
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Italy
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Fair enough as I can only comment on what I read and match reports so I defer to those who see 90 minutes of each match.

    However, I still find it strange that even watching the highlights and following the reports, (putting aside bizarre refereeing decisions that usually go against us), enough good chances seemed to go begging in a lot of games to see off the opposition which, if they had been put away we would now be in a comfortable postion and half the fickle posters on here would be singing Morais' praises.
     
  5. troff

    troff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,210
    Likes Received:
    12,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    donny
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Possibly, though I wouldn’t be one of them.

    The players as a whole aren’t good enough. Not his fault.

    Individual errors cost us - also not his fault.

    However the fact we back off and retreat when anyone runs at us is consistent across the board. Has he raised it, coached it out? It seems to me the defensive plan appears to be lose the ball and run backwards without making a challenge. He could and should have improved that.

    He should also have realised that Matt Mills is not a better centre back than Ethan Pinnock or even Matty Pearson; he should have realised that Ezekiel Fryers is not good enough and played Cavare, maybe even McCarthy to be fair over fryers, and moved Yiadom across.

    He should have realised that despite the limitations of all the rest of the squad that he has a very good centre forward and playing him on the left wing isn’t helping him; I can stomach the 4-3-3 and him being isolated a little as at least he’ll drift in on occasion and get a chance at some point. I can’t accept what he was given to do at Leeds, mind numbingly stupid IMO.

    Relegation will be the net result of selling all our better players, replacing them with poor quality lower league kids, poor management and coaching, a period of (for sad reasons) a lack of a rudder at the head of the club. All of those things.

    Not all of them would have needed to be improved for us to survive - I mean Christ on a bike we still might, we ought to have been sunk weeks ago. But the division this year is exceptionally bad. Well from mid table down anyway. As bad as it is, the squad is clearly much better for morais than it was for Heckingbottom. It’s short of a goalkeeper and midfield options but compared to the August to January period it is better. The results have not reflected this.

    Heckingbottom I think is no more than an average manager. Morais though has evidenced he is less than that.

    If and when relegation occurs he is just as culpable for it as anyone else. His lack of ability is just as much to blame as the lack of the players ability. With anyone half decent and a little experience in charge we’d have got one or two more results in my view.
     

Share This Page