Operation Yellow Hammer

Exactly the same as I see the extreme far right of the Spectrum.

They are both cheeks from the same arse.

There is once you get past the jingoistic noises there is very little difference.

Both are riddled with intolerance towards people who do not share or agree with their views, be it religious, racial or not believing the same mantra.

Both have a capacity for extreme violence, both have historically committed the same against people who dont fit into their political circle.

Do i think they are all evil?

No.

Very few people are evil.

The problem arises when those who are of that mindset find others of the same mixed with someone who is a good orator who can influence a mass audience.

Using Farage as an example , he is a gifted orator. Theres no denying this.

Is he evil? No more so than say Mcdonnell who again is capable of inspiring a crowd.

 

How very apt.

 

Are you inferring that the current Labour top brass are far left in their political thinking?
Because I’m confused as to why you’ve brought it up otherwise.

 

You do realise that a party having the word socialism in its name doesn't make it socialist? It's like the dictatorships that call themselves "People's Democratic Republic... " - paying lip service to ideals to try and gain an element of legitimacy

 

his post made me smile, the internet is amazing, all the information you could ever want or need but people use it to tell everyone how little they know. what a time to be alive!

 

It's like a sociology degree.

 

Pig breading will be protected because they're more than likely related to most of the cabinet, and Boris Johnson doesn't do bad in the breeding department does he?!

 

National Socialist German Workers' Party

 

I've got Angie stuck in my head for some reason.

 

I posted about the Dunning Kruger effect about a month ago, and ever since you have used it to put people down. The irony is that In doing so, you prove it time and again.

 

Shame on you

 

Why should he be ashamed of what he believes?

 

Pigeon chess:
Trix says he doesn’t like freedom of movement because it allows people to travel here and have automatic rights to benefits.
Many explain that’s not true
Trix posts extract from an internet page be believes has proven his point.
Several explain that’s not what it says
Trix slags everyone off for loving Corbyn and being brainwashed
I point out I used to train people to pay benefits and it’s definitely not the case.
Trix makes a joke about me not proving anything then doesn’t comment for a few days.
Trix returns and reminds people how he was right about immigration.

That’s archetypal pigeon chess. He’s kicked over all the pieces, **** on the board and declared himself winner.

 

Read the discussion re immigration with Trixie and tell me how you conclude that.

Preced above if you can’t be bothered to look.

 

Were you insulting me though?

 

I saw a description of Brexit the other day that rung true. Brexit is mainly supported by older members of the Tory party - those that voted in Thatcher and cheered her "progress" with her manifesto to privatize anything that moved are now voted to take the country back to the 70s - before any of the things they voted for in the first place.

 

That's brilliant, 'cos I love ham sandwiches. Nice soft granary roll, bit of mustard. Ace.

 

One of the problems is the legal standing of the referendum. If it was legally-binding, the overspending by various groups would make it null and void (Venice convention). There is also the question mark over the source of the funding for the Leave campaign (it is under investigation by the NCA/Met police), which is allegedly being stalled by 12 high-ranking tories - including at least one Home Secretary and former PM.

Because it was legally advisory, but politically binding, it can't be made null and void - even though electoral law was broken (and admitted in court by the governments defence team).

Another problem is the changing demographics - over 600K die each year, and a similar number of new voters join the register. This has changed the voting demographics by about 10% in 3 years (over 4 million people), so the "Will of the People" is increasingly less true.

So, if May had gone out and after a close result pursued EFTA or Switzerland relationship then I think most people would have supported it and we would have already left. She decided (with pressure from ERG) to end FoM and leave the SM and CU, and threaten the rights of the EU citizens in the UK - against the words of the Leave campaign and many leading Leavers in 2016. Decisions like these have left us in a position where suddenly people want No Deal because it might end it quickly, but there is a significant risk that some people might die. My wife is one that has 3 medications on the list that are not made in the UK and supply could be threatened by delays at Dover - this wouldn't kill her (immediately), but could lead to potential life-affecting problems as a result (increased risk of problems including amputation, blindness, heart attack and stroke).

 

i agree and if the common market had remained just that then we probably would not be debating brexit

 

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/...vince-ourselves-the-eu-referendum-was-stolen/