It isn't. There is a worst case scenario version that truly is frightening. This report edges more to best case scenario.
I wasn't referring to his agenda, but I did read that he once commented that it would be a shame if north korea succumbed to the ways of the imperialist west as the south had, or something to that effect. What you refuse to believe is that sometimes his veil has slipped. Instead you write it off as right wing propaganda,he’s a dangerous man. But you keep the specs on pal, they suit you.
Just read that again... you’re calling someone a communist based not on the hundreds of hours of speeches we can hear, or his party’s published manifesto but... something you believe you once read but can’t quite remember. It’s a strange attitude to ‘evidence’.
I'm genuinely shocked time and time again how people can't see through the governments propaganda and lies. It's should be so clear to anyone with access to the internet and half a brain that this was set out as an expected case that the government have now dressed up as the worst case since it's been leaked, they've even changed the name of the bloody document to suit. As others have said before, if this is the worst case why haven't they followed up by a release of the best case?
If the Germans and French had taken David Cameron seriously and not laughed at him then we wouldn’t be debating this. They ain’t laughing now - they have to find someone else to pay the bills. We pay £10 to £15 BILLION per year into the EU and get about £5 billion of that back. Of that £5 billion there is £3.5 billion going to UK farmers in handouts. Many of these farmers are wealthy people. For example - Prince Charles receives a £1 million handout per year because of the land he owns.
I've been saying this all along. Imagine the EU as a stool. The three legs being Germany, France and the UK. What happens if you take away one of the legs?
He’s not a communist. Don’t get the two mixed up. When you write things like this, it adds to the narrative that all Brexiteers know fcukk all about politics and social issues. You aren’t helping yourself.
A matter of seconds to find the real position on freedom of movement (surprisingly not exactly the same as outlined on this thread) https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/residence/residence-rights/workers/index_en.htm
Read it. Don’t half read it and fill in the gaps based on something you ‘believe’. As I pointed out earlier, you just flip flop when proved wrong, wait a bit then announce you were right. See above when you told me my benefit knowledge was out of date and that I didn’t understand Jobseekers Allowance. I point out that JSA was replaced by UC years ago and you ignore it. I’ll guarantee you still believe you know better, despite the fact you’re demonstrably wrong.
Listening to a discussion on Jeremy Vine about ‘the death of the truth’. It’s scary; but they walk among us.
I just have, and I haven't seen anything that diesnt align with what I’m saying about eu migrants being allowed to come here in numbers we cant control, they then have a right to benefits and welfare ????
That rights to benefits, rights to stay past three months, rights to permanent residency, the need to register with host country immigration services etc etc are all set at member country level rather than by the EU. For example in Belgium all EU citizens and family members must carry a passport or other form of ID with them by law. In Denmark it is very restrictive and subject to obtaining a right to residence with attaching conditions. The UK could have implemented far more checks on EU migrants if they had wanted to. I believe Govts of the day decided the costs of implementing were not worth it as majority of EU migrants worked, paid taxes and generally were not a problem.
Brexit is becoming like school kids in a playground. Playing football at dinner and it's next goal winner. One team scores but the other says it isn't the winner because the bell hasn't gone to go back to class.