If there was an unreserved apology and an admission they'd behaved in an awful manner I wouldn't hold a grudge necessarily. And if Daniel accepted it then not at all.
What I would like to add, as a very final point, is that reading posts on here that treat this situation as if they split from a long term partner is completely alien to me. I get that people get invested in their club at different levels but never have I ever witnessed anything like what I've seen this week. Yes, I have a polar opposite view point to many people on here, but not once did I tell anyone to leave the board. It's a shame that. I enjoyed debating this situation, it's good to get other view points, sometimes you have to be a bit direct to get to the heart of the matter, I don't think I was rude or offensive in doing that though. Anyway, that's that.
You're 2 for 2 as well. Are you Vesps alter ego? ;-) No of course not. Theres somebody who gets their panties in a bunch every now and then and has sly personal digs at me for some unknown reason. Can't recall if its you or not. But not to worry, each to their own.
I didn't tell you to leave the board, don't try and twist my words. I get that this is different for you and that's fine, but to repeat it several times doesn't send out the best message to other people. It ends up coming across that you are trying to get people to behave like you.
I think a petition would be better to try and get the board to rethink their policy / plan rather than try and reinstate a stacked manager. Also it looks like it’s been written by a 6 year old. I did not want Stendel sacked but it would not change anything. He would carry on stubbornly trying to play these players in a style not currently suited to their ability or the championship. What’s done is done. Should be trying to ensure it’s not repeated in the future
I don't go chasing people around, not my style -I say what I see, the only person I've ever blocked is Nudger, and he's a special case.
Fair do's. Though in this case, I'm not sure what you're seeing, or why you're seeing what you perceive you're seeing, nor why you choose to comment on what you perceive you're seeing.
....there actually could be a reason for a company to put out a statement like that with no thanks. I hope to god not in this case but believe you me companies are quite morally entitled to put out such statements in certain circumstances.
I'm really not sure how to comment to that. To say you don't want any adverse comment about the club and the owners until we know more, you've certainly whipped up a few conspiracy theories about our ex HC, and this, if i'm understanding just what you're saying, is really something you shouldn't be saying aloud, and certainly not on a public forum.
I do not want the board sacking (Is that even possible?) What I would like is the recruitment team to rethink their plan/strategy that benefits the first team for the short/mid term when targeting new players.
I wanted to ignore your post but I must respond. I was not inferring anything. I was responding to your statement that there is never a reason for a Company to put out such a statement. I think we should stop this here and now. I don't expect a reply.
Just be aware that commenting to suppress a view of the owners, then leaving something like that open ended which without intent can encourage conspiracy and potentially some very damaging words that could impact a persons reputation. Its not good. have to be careful all ways. That was my point.
DWLC You clearly are the kind of person who likes to have the last word. I respect that. I do not have a problem with that. Just like I respect your right to disagree, with which I do not have a problem either. Best Regards. Good evening. 55&C
