I believe the EFL's stance on entering administration is confusing in that it allows for certain caveats like " an Act of God or a pandemic" to cloud any interpretation. It needs amending so that no one has any doubt going forward re- "put the Club into administration for whatever reason and you will incur an immediate 12 point deduction." You are asking for problems from smart legal representatives when you introduce any form of " wriggleroom."
Surely the Wigan Administrator would know what Wigan owe to us. I am guessing they owe us an installment on Moore next month but I dont think they have defaulted yet. If they win their appeal though there is every chance that they will then shaft us by not paying for Moore on the due date and we get it significantly later if they get a buyer in place - or not at all if they dont - that would be the perfect Irony - we get sent down but then Wigan cant start the season in the style of Bury
Lots of hand wringing and wailing going on here the owner voluntarily chose to put his club into admin because he didn’t want to/couldn’t pay the bills. -12 point penalty imposed by the EFL. I don’t even know who they are appealing against, there own owner? The EFL for actually imposing their own rules for a change or god? I’m not even convinced them winning would be good, if I were a prospective buyer I’d want the club in league 1 as it would be significantly cheaper to buy?
Big "if"here....but if wigan are succesful with their appeal, do we then get our own chance to appeal?
that’s if they pay 25p in the pound, the debts aren’t massive from what I’ve read (once you’ve removed owner investment) losses per year were high but once you’ve sold the players that’s sorted too
I think our presence is to show that we are no pushovers and we'll fight our corner this time. It will stop them thinking that overturning the deduction is going to be the easiest option.
But who against? EFL's decision was to impose the prescribed penalty. The independent appeal panel will decide the 'force majeure' point according to the discretion they are given to decide the matter. I think their decision will be the end of the matter. Furthermore, I think our representations will be limited to arguing why force majeure does not apply.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53583068 seems our board/owners are taking this seriously and lookng after our backs.
It has. Discussed at length in the thread here http://barnsleyfc.org.uk/threads/wigan-fans-view-on-the-appeal.293774/page-18#post-2517429
That seems a bit strange to me. I know it will obviously impact us massively if their point deduction is rescinded but that can be used in a decision about whether they are innocent or not (or whatever it is they are trying to claim). I wonder if we are trying to make a point that even if their appeal is successful, we shouldn't go down anyway. I think I saw something where we said that, I'm not too sure how we could argue that but it's a possibility that we'd try.
What's the 'force majeure' they're claiming? The Covid pandemic??? Given that every other club, at every level, also had to deal with it, and that we knew the **** might well hit fan in that regard from around February onwards, they're p1ssing in the wind, no?? Or am I missing summat?
It's something to do with the fact that they were put into administration without being declared insolvent, without having been issued with a WUP, or without having missed any payments to anyone. Their argument is that their administration was for some reason unjust: the Football League have already said, I think, that COVID is not force majeure.
Equally being put into administration without having been issued with a WUP, or without having missed any payments to anyone is not force majeure either. Annoying for them perhaps but not FM
It seems to me they are arguing that the "scandal" of the takeover is the force majeure. In a sense that they believe the owner either had illegal betting interests or his sole motive was always to asset strip the club. And the EFL were negligent when approving the sale. There's a bloke on twitter who is apparently been in touch with the QC and he has stated the following: "See, the etymological meaning of force majeure is like "a god event" so something natural and out of human control, but it could also be argued in the legal sense that a global scandal is out of club's control and should be classed in the same way" They seem ridiculously confident.