Just seen the highlights...looks like Bradshaw's first 'goal' was put in by Hourihane and not Bradshaw?...Oh the irony if it did!
I thought that at first. I've watched it 17,472 times since and I think it's about 75:25 in favour of a Bradshaw goal. It would be a great conspiracy theory if it was an own goal though - maybe a clause in the deal?
Admittedly after only a couple of viewings at full speed, to me it looks as though it should have been a penalty (had it not gone in anyway!)
Very difficult to say from that angle, Hourihane was certainly between Bradshaw and the keeper and may have assisted by unsighting him. You'd need to be looking along the line of the ball to say for sure if he got a touch. It would only be an OG if Bradshaw's effort was off-target in the first place.
Like John Stones jumping over Winnall's shot last season to allow us to score, I think CH gave us a hand with that one as well. It should have been a penalty at least but thank goodness the ref played on. Not the cleanest of strikes but he was there to finish off a brilliant move and you can't ask any more of your centre forward.