get the sponging dole bastads to work yessssss made my day that has

RE: I preferred the shops on Church Street

Agreed far more people matey! I have been amazed! You wouldn't believe there was a credit crunch!
But it is sad to see the empty shops on Church Street.
I've not seen the arena yet.

I do love Liverpool but it does still have a long way to go.

 

Avoidance/Evasion

amount to the same thing in my book.

We should thank these generous rich folk for even considering giving us proles work.

 

RE: Redstar, I can't believe how f@cked up that statement is

Maybe Zukkseter is probably one of the middle-class tax avoidance types?

 

RE: So if they know there's 2 million fraudsters or

David Freud is an investment banker.

 

Not at all the same.

</p>

But you're welcome to pay more tax if it sits better with your principles. No? Funny how the line is always drawn somewhere north of one's own earnings.</p>

Without private enterprise we wouldn't have anything like the lifestyle we do here. I wouldn't say those in business deserve the thanks of their employees but a bitmore respect forthose who stick their necks out and provide the jobs wouldn't go amiss.</p>

 

I'm not that old so obviously ant been getting taxed for too long but is still bloody frustrating obviously. I feel that this country should review its systems and come up with alternative ones and try and make a solution that fits everyones needs, obviously it's easier said than done however surely there should be a certain amount of time someone can be allowed to go on it. Do they actually bother checking whether you are in fact searching for a job with EFFORT, not just the look at the machines which they provide. I dont understand how people can want a life living off other peoples benefits! How can you not feel guilty of spending any of this money when you do not deserve it. Dunt get me wrong I understand in some circumstances it helps and people are deserving of it, I just think the goverment needs a big re shake up.
Regards

 

made few mistakes in there but I cba to retype the whole thing or bring attention to em.
Regards

 

RE: wHY ISN'T THIS SAME VITRIOL & HATE..AIMED AT

cos I like them

 

Just need to close a few more of the loopholes that they use nt

 

Well. that's fine mate.

Everyone's well aware of what's on either side of the legal line. The question is do we want to encourage private enterprise or not? A quick look at a political map should answer that question.</p>

 

RE: wHY ISN'T THIS SAME VITRIOL & HATE..AIMED AT

.

 

In Ackyland, always.

</p>

The entire back-catalogue of the misdeeds of mankind ( Anglo-saxons notwithstanding ) can be dismissed with one quick reference to the combined actions of Tony Blair and George Bush.</p>

 

RE: Not at all the same.

I would pay more tax if it was going to benefit people who need it.

 

RE: Not at all the same.

Yes, there is no law being broken, but morally you can easily argue that the billions of pounds in unpaid taxes is costing public funded organisations such as the health sector, education, police, local councils etc... a fortune. Not only that it's costing people who *do* pay their taxes more money because they end up paying for increases in public services that would be funded by those avoiding paying the tax they should.

 

If the system allows earnings to go untaxed...

</p>

...then they're not &quot;unpaid taxes&quot; are they? You say they &quot;should&quot; pay more as if it's a fact, it's just your opinion and of course the line where people &quot;should&quot; pay more taxes will always be north of your earnings. It's also important to point out that high earners already pay hundreds of times more than you or I do to use the same public services. You can't go into an argument stating as fact your opinionthat they &quot;should&quot; pay more. I'm not saying they should or shouldn't, just pointing out that you assume what you believe to be &quot;right&quot; is the only valid way to look at things and, of course, while ever you're posting from work and moralising at me with your hand in my pocket yourwords are worthless.</p>

In the real world we have to offer the captains of industry these perks or suffer the effects on the economy that them taking their business elsewhere would bring about. The fact that they don't pay more in taxes isn't costing public funded organisations anything because they'd bugger off if we tried to make them. If you're so concerned about the finances of public funded organisations stop posing on the internet all day and do something to earn yoursalary. </p>

 

This country absolutely needs the right balance. I'm not a fan of people that have no intention of ever working and claim benefits and breed to claim higher incomes. However, I'm alo not a fan of allowing big UK grown businesses to use loopholes to not pay taxes that they should.

The UK is a major world economy and businesses want to sell their products here because there are bigger profit margins compared to other economies. Dyson made an absolute mint growing his business in the UK, at the moment he decided to bugger off and lay off hundreds of people because it was cheaper elsewhere and he didn't like the taxes and rates payable. We should have waved goodbye and told him he can't sell his products in the UK anymore unless he pays significantly higher import tax.

 

Just to throw a new idea into the ring

How about this idea:

US Fair Tax

Remove all income taxation and have a flat tax on purchases.

 

It's one way of looking at it.

</p>

But how do you fund things that it's not possible to meter the usage of? </p>

</p>

</p>

</p>

</p>

.</p>

 

RE: I think he has issues judging by his attitude..

</p>

Windy Windy Windy Windy.</p>

 

RE: I think he has issues judging by his attitude..

</p>

Windy Windy Windy Windy.</p>