You are a F ucking idiot aren't you? Not sorry for swearing but hey ho you have got what you wanted which are attention and replies.
flintoff is a tryer but not a winner. the difference is in them can be seen in ipl money max. flintoff was hardly wanted, kp was wanted and hit record amount a few years ago.
Why does it all come down to money with you? I know you don`t have to go out to work and earn it for yourself, so you have not got a clue as to the real value of it, but money is not the be all and end all of things, neither is how many cups a player has won, I bet you have never heard of Tony Currie or Frank Worthington or Stan Bowles these 3 were great players and great entertainers, they did not win loads of trophies, but they were better players individually than 95% of the players that have won loads of medals. I really have not got a clue as to why I am trying to educate someone that clearly has the same willingness to learn as a fruit fly! If football was all about winning trophies then there would only be 6 clubs in england.
it is about what you win, he said it himself. in sport, second place is the first of the losers. at the top end ie top 1%. the best earn the most.
http://www.4dfoot.com/2011/12/14/paul-gascoigne-best-in-the-world/ Have a look Philip, and then tell us we are all blind, and that as a 29 year old male, I was stupid to have Gazza as my footballing hero growing up, the guy I tried to copy in the playground...
Whilst trying not to echo others I don't feel he ruined his career; when I think of Paul Gascoigne, I think of his goal against Scotland in the euro 96, or his tears at the World Cup, or scoring 2 goals after burning himself in the bath moments before going out onto the pitch. Gazza was a character, who'll be remembered for his ability on the pitch; nobody's wondering what could have been, because we all saw Gazza at his best. This is maybe a bit of an unfair comparison, but do you think Zidane's headbutt on Marco Matterazzi ruined his career? No, we'd seen Zidane at his prime, and therefore he'll be remembered for his ability on the pitch, rather than his occasional ugly side.
He scored 1/5.7 for england...90ish career goals gerrard 1/4.5 ...100 career lamps less than 1/4.5...160 career goals avg 5.7 caps a year over 10 years makes me think did he want to play for england. Compared to Rooney 73 caps AT 26. that makes me think, when picked hes there. and he cant think i'll play for eng and mabe do my self in because we arent going for the prem ect and give 80%
You really are a sad little man with your very poor attempts at winding people up and your faux hate of Gazza. Using some shockingly bad stats to back up your argument doesn't really wash. If winning trophies is the bench mark you have set to say how good a player is your logic is fundamentally flawed.
Well I'd certainly like to nominate this for the biggest load of non football ****** posted this year
Answer me 1 question What do you reckon to Wayne Rooney sticking it to prostitutes when his wife was pregnant ?
not good but on a scale on 1 to 10 you compare it to a wife beating, kid ditching drug addict its quite low.
AYE he was fu.cking sh.it was Gazza, i can remember buying a video of the best goals of the 89-90 season and Gazza was the majority. That goal at Luton on the video you posted was sheer quality the way he got between the 2 defenders, i'd like to see 1 of Phil's heros RNL, Clarke, or Stones do something like that. But lets not forget this is the same lad who thinks Le Tissier was sh.it also