40k fine. don't know how they've come to that. seemed like 1 man's word against another. And what implications for the england captain?
Can't see how he won't get anything. Pretty clear what he said as for Suarez if the ref didn't hear it or the cameras picked owt up is it all based or guess work and assumptions?
you can bet fergie was the judge in suarez's case.....fooking stinks.........................retire fergie you silly old lovely person. horrible fooker he is
Isnt 99% of stuff in court one mans word against anothers. Sorry he cant have killed, there isnt any video footage. JT says so. Flipping eck.
Didn't it come out in the papers some weeks ago that Suarez had called him a "negrito" ?. They must have some good evidence to ban him for 8 games, JT needs to get at least the same punishment IMO
of course it is. one man says it wasnt him another man says it is they both make pleas panel discuss .
Yeah OK you're right, I bow to your superior knowledge of the British legal system, keep up the good work hemsworth QC
Are you judge Nutmeg from Vic Reeve's big night out circa 1989? You are compairing murder in a court of law with an alledged racial abuse case on a football field?
This how they caught the Yorkshire Ripper? Sit in a room,have a chat,toss a coin.heads its him tails it isn't? Summat like that?
FA are a ****ing joke Suarez so called racial abuses some one 8 games ban Morgan nearly kills Hume 0 (zero) match ban complete tossers, never trust them ever
Racially abuse someone whilst sat in row A and its a three year ban. Racially abuse someone whilst stood a few yards further forward on the pitch and its a one month ban. How exactly is that right?
No HT there is something called evidence and a jury that decided the outcome. In the case of Suarez it seems like he has been found guilty without evidence.
Re: FA are a ****ing joke I was going to say exactly the same..... Referee dealt with the confrontation between Suarez & Evra during the game so therefore it cannot be reviewed under the rules the FA say we are governed by!!! Unless we suggest name calling is worse than ABH! Couldn't care what Suarez said in the heat of the moment, sticks & stones and all.... Doesn't make him racist its just a visual comment! FFS there are rapper songs in the charts with far more aggressive racial flavour and films on every night of the week with reference to "white snowflake" or "white chocolate" .... Isn't that racist! Oh, no it can't be, it's only a white comment!
One thing that i'm a little bit confused by is the defence. Liverpool and Suarez seem to be arguing two totally different defences. The first being that negro doesnt mean the same thing in Uruguay which is a fair enough defence if true and the second is that the conversation never took place and he never said it. If the second is true then why the hell did the original defence centre around the meaning of the word negro? The negro meaning defence makes no sense if no conversation took place. In my opinion anyway.