I don't honestly believe that anyone who posts on this board is against keith hill, as most can see he's doing a reasonable job with limited resources. Its just that some are yet to be convinced he is the new messiah and it really p1sses me off that they are vilified on here for stating so. Some days it's like the Spanish inquisition, "is hill god?". "well his tactics weren't very good today". "die you heretic barsteward"
Nobody expects <img src ="http://rationalwiki.org/w/images/0/05/NOBODY_EXPECTS_THE_SPANISH_INQUISITION!.jpg"> And they're not afraid to use the comfy chair! <img src =" http://people.csail.mit.edu/paulfitz/spanish/tt12.jpg">
wasn't that your post about hill lickers. seems you put provocative posts on then when someone reacts you try to distance yourself from them. and come over i'm holier than thou. the word hypocrite comes to my mind
A. The hill lickers tag was an attempt at a pun on "hill flicker" and was intended to be lighthearted B. I still defy anyone to defend that line up and performance today, which lies fairly and squarely at the managers door. C. "In hill we thrust" was also a light hearted pun on an often quoted saying on here If you want to twist it into something else feel free. hypocrite or heretic? I'm still feeling that latter
A. thats your problem you post what you want then when anyone reacts its a bit of fun or lighthearted banter. you can't have it all ways where as anything that hill supporters post is gospel and needs to be mocked but your only kidding or its just a pun when confronted. i also post lighthearted and serious threads but i don't blame others for not knowing the difference. its usually obvious (i think )
One thing you are proving is that your sense of humour is 1 on a scale of 1-1000. It seems that you are as sensitive about people making a bit of fun of hill supporters, as you are about people criticising hill. Chill out, I'm a hill fan too, but he ain't no messiah.
ok, your not answering points just turning the points i'm making to suit yourself i'm off. i just can't understand anyone that starts a thread calling others then tries saying something different when asked why.
No, he's a very naughty boy. Let's send him to Coventry with no tea, let him think about what he's done. 4-1-4-1 indeed!
The only question you asked me was, had I posted a thread that you quoted. Didn't see any point in answering that as it was quoted. Feel free to ask me some proper questions, I'll answer them
