7 Subs again next season.

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Mapplewell Tyke, Jun 1, 2012.

  1. Map

    Mapplewell Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,034
    Likes Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Birmingham & Derby proposed it to the league and the Football League clubs have voted in favour.
     
  2. dreamboy3000

    dreamboy3000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    59,747
    Likes Received:
    26,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    DB3K Towers
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I wonder if we voted in favour as Hill was all for subs being reduced.
     
  3. JLWBigLil

    JLWBigLil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    50,819
    Likes Received:
    32,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Was he?

    I was under the impression he was totally against the reduction, especially as the decision had been made without any managers being consulted.
     
  4. RichK

    RichK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    29,648
    Likes Received:
    3,072
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Good move, more chance for young uns to be involved.
     
  5. Map

    Mapplewell Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,034
    Likes Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    From Twitter:

    The Football League ‏@football_league
    BREAKING NEWS: #FootballLeague clubs have voted to return to 7 subs next season following proposals from Birmingham City & Derby County
     
  6. Whi

    Whitey Guest

    My thoughts exactly.
     
  7. Brianpotter

    Brianpotter Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,674
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Newsagent - Or paperboy if you wish!!
    Location:
    bolton
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Re: Was he?

    Agreed - Hill was definately in favour of 7 subs to help development of young uns.....
     
  8. Whi

    Whitey Guest

    Re: Was he?

    I think our club would have been against it. Because it will cost us extra money to have two extra bodies on the bench. Probably.
     
  9. Gre

    GreekMan New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    brians gopher
    Location:
    top end of dodworth bottom
    Re: Was he?

    do the 7 subs have to include young players, i.e. under 21's? if not then it should be made compulsory to have at least 2 surely.
     
  10. andytyke

    andytyke Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    2,886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Featherstone
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Re: Was he?

    Sure I remember Hill moaning that the number of subs had been reduced
     

Share This Page