Played one game for Gainsbrough Trinity towards the end of last season, mate of mine watches them, he came on as sub when they were 2-0 up at home with 20 mins to go and they lost 3-2! Never played for them again!
I think that's being kind. From what I've heard he was a complete kn0b who thought he was a cross between Bobby Moore and Marvin Hagler.
Liam Dickinson? Jay Maccavelli? Jeronimo Morales-Neumann? Diego Arismendi? Matt Hill? Garry O'Connor? Jim O'Brien.... oh no, he's not a flop anymore, now King Keith has poilished him up. Here fishy fishy.
Dickinson - better than Goldbourne. Ditto McEveley. Morales only played about five minutes and was on next to nowt. Arismendi - better than Perkins and Dawson. Matt Hill - better than Goldbourne. O'Connor looked quality early on and that is undeniable. Not Robins's fault that things went down the shitter with him.
I said LIAM Dickinson. But I'm assuming your response was a piss-take, Conan? Maccavelli better than Golbourne?! Give me a break. Same goes for Matt Hill. Morales was pub team standard in the reserves, and was brought here for none football reasons I think. But my favourite bit of your post was you suggesting that Arismendi was better than Perkins/Dawson. Aye, and next you'll be telling me Carl Regan was a better full back than Bobby Hassell.
Tbf to Hemsworth, for once he has a point. You'd bloody need to be taking drugs or drinking to believe the ***** you just said about Arismendi, Maccavelli and Hill. No offence like.
I've not seen any evidence that Golbourne is better than Matt Hill or that Dawson is better than Arismendi. They may turn out to be better players but on the evidence so far I think they're inferior. Opinions and all that, but Conan certainly isn't mental for suggesting such.