Will Wiseman survive the chop tonight?

Discuss . . . I think not.

 

Why, have you poisoned it?

 

Mmmm Barnsdley Chop thas got mi slavering nar.

 

Yes and this blind faith in one of the worst players to ever pull on the shirt will be Hills downfall

 

26% win rate and we still sung for Hill on Saturday.

Wiseman playing and lose and that could've been the last time.

He finally saw sense with Steele.

 

IMO the only way Wiseman won't start for us in games is if he's injured or banned. If he's fit enough to play I can't see him ever being dropped from the starting lineup. I'm here to be proved wrong Keef

 

Mike Flynn
Carl Regan
Keith Brown
David Mulligan
Brian O'Callaghan
Andy Holt
Paul Gibbs

 

He should play right back after his performance in the last 70 minutes.

 

Aye, right back in the dressing room! ;-)

 

Or left back in the dressing room.

Oh Bobby Hassell . . . . . .

 

is he really that bad, or ishe constantly played out of position ?

Simon Davey was good at doing that. I think he would be better as a squad player and used only in mid-field.Especially with the new signings.

 

Re: is he really that bad, or ishe constantly played out of position ?

So you're saying that playing a right back in midfield would help a kid who's being played out of position?

 

I wouldn't complain too much if he was at right full back, although I do think both Hassell and Stones are better than him in that position: Hassell at defending if we want to stay solid, Stones at attacking if we want to push our full backs on.

Wiseman weighed in with an assist on Tuesday and he did look better when he was moved out right, but there were a couple of times when his man was in oceans of space because Wiseman had inexplicably wandered back in to the centre. Maybe he'd forgotten where he was supposed to be playing. I wouldn't be surprised with our musical chairs policy for team selection.

 

At least if he's at right back he'll see less of the ball and be less likely to screw up!

 

Its not wisemans fault either, hes just not good enough be it at full back or center half. and in 10 years time when he's moved on he will be in that list that dyson posted

 

well he obviously cannot defend

so a defensive midfield could work for him.Was there any real need to answer so aggresively too?

 

Re: well he obviously cannot defend

Was there any need to read too much into a reply to a post? No aggression what so ever.

And I'd probably prefer my defensive midfielders to be able to defend too, mate.

 

Re: well he obviously cannot defend

You do sound a bit arsey to be fair. It's difficult on a message board though, sometimes people read a tone that wasn't intended. You don't normally sound that way.

Sorry, I'll keep me nose out.

 

wow

have you ever considered anger management classes.