Was it there all along or not? If yes, then why all the **** from Hill before? If no, where has it mysteriously come from? I think its always been there, said it all along !
Agree mate, he's tried to do it on the cheap with unproven players, to show how wonderful he is. Proper bitten him on his arse, and cost 1500 season tickets.
How has him not signing these laikers before now cost 1500 season tickets? The season tickets came on the back of the run last season and the economic situation. Not the fact he didn't sign Greening and Tudgay in July.
Yes it did, if decent championship players were signed during the window of selling season tickets, it is almost certain more would have renewed.
I dunno mate. But if it was I don't think it's a bad thing - if he spends all his budget and then needs a couple of laikers he's screwed int he?
"Yes it did, if decent championship players were signed during the window of selling season tickets, it is almost certain more would have renewed." Can you two **** off and start your own thread for an argument, I am trying to find out an answer!! Set of thread hogging ****s
Well the latest loans are only until January 1st aren't they? They aren't going to change things in the long run unless they sign season long??
I dont dislike all of them, just the ones I dont like. I thought that was what the button was for, so it shows you disagree, but does not cause the thread to get tangled up with criticisms?
I asked Don that very question. I was confused by the answer. Couldn't tell you now if it was an injection of capital or it had always been there. It started off sounding like the former and finished up sounding like the latter. Sorry, can't help.
Maybe the budget only allows loan signings of the quality we've brought in from mid November until January?