Of course we had width. For such an analyst of the game how did you miss it? The performance, setup and style yesterday was about as far away from anything Keith served up as you can get.
Not clinging to anything at all. Just making an observation that we've played pretty well all season. The only difference yesterday was we took our chances at the right time and had a bit of luck. That Leeds shot goes in instead of hitting the bar then it's sidekick out on here.
There's a point in there. Hill was our saviour after the Birmingham game. Then look what happened. Up to 5pm yesterday, there were still many people against Flicker getting the job. Myself included. The Leeds game could be a one off. But we have little to grasp at right now, and I think what many saw yesterday, was something very different to anything that Hill managed to serve up. Both on and off the pitch. Travesty if Flicker leaves the Club today..
I think the accusation that Dyson is clinging on to us having played well under Hill is being made by those who were previously against Flicker, and are suggesting there has been a fundamental change since he took over to save face. Performances had suffered to an extent towards the end under Hill but there hasn't been a seismic change under Flicker.
I'm always wasting mi breath. Living in York nobody gives a toss about my theories on BFC. They're too busy supporting Dirty Leeds. At least people bother to disagree with me on here.
He had a **** 2012 and I can't argue against him going. I just think the last two games show how important that bit of luck is and I don't think we got much these past few months Flickons read and white army.