FAO WHitey

Steve Morgan, the chairman, has revealed that no Wolves players have clauses written

Whitey, stop talking 100% *****.

Your there will be release clauses in the contracts of wolves players his Bullcrap.

You might know one players contract but he's not a wolves player and will not know about there wages.

Non of the Wolves players have Contract clauses for relegation according to STEVE MORGAN, you know him who runs wolves.

Steve Morgan, the chairman, has revealed that no Wolves players have clauses written into their contracts to take pay cuts should they drop out of the Championship, raising the possibility of a major squad clear out at cut-price fees.

 

You are bang out of order.

 

Stop sitting on the fence Hemmsy. If YT has said something that has wound you up then get him told.

 

Anyone?

 

Agree with the basis point of we dont know the details, but fact is you dont know if what he says is true either do you?

After reading countless posts containing utter ******** from you i cant believe your calling someone out on the forum? Your literally the lowest person id expect to do that, what do you offer besides laughter at how pathetic you are.

Get a ****ing grip

 

He's talking 100% ****.

He's coming out with the opposite that MORGANS saying FFS.

If Rogger Johnson's playing for Wolves in league one he will get 25K a week like this season. O'Hara will get 1 million next season same as this season. Hammill will get the same as this season.

They have a wage budget of 25 million.

 

You started a new thread, why?

As for my point, I stand by it. Every Prem club has clauses included in players contracts should they be relegated. 33% is the figure used by most clubs.

That was what I stated. I then 'assumed' that this would also count for clubs relegated from the Championship. But if Wolves' chairman says they haven't, then it's further evidence that that club is failing it's supporters. Although I'd take what he says with a pinch of salt.


Thanks for the outburst, though.

 

How nice.

 

Rogger and out.

 

Yes but they aren't Prem contracts and not every player does. QPR players DON'T. Samba rumoured to be on 100k a week doesn't. Remy Doesn't. Green Doesn't.

your right with the wolves players though about last season but they are still on a lot of money. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...elegated-to-League-One-from-Championship.html

 

Which two players are QPR's most saleable assets? Why do you only pick anomalies for your arguments and treat them as gospel for the majority of clubs. I genuinely feel sorry for you, so sad.

 

Agree but the article was with Morgan, we will know these wages....

 

100% ****? Are you sure about that? Really?

You do realise that I'm merely a football supporter with no motive, don't you? And thus you do realise that Steve Morgan has motives galore, whenever he opens his mouth?

They WILL have had wage cuts, AGAIN. Believe me, don't believe me, but 100% **** I don't chat, and have no reason to, no motive..


It serves Morgan's motive, to state that his players HAVEN'T had a wage cut. Because then he can flog them off and the supporters will take it easier.


But we are now discussing a seperate point. The thread I contributed in was about Adam Hammill. And someone stated he was on 16k a week. He isn't, and myself and another pointed that out and gave our reasoning for that.

You then bulldozed your way through it in your inimitable style, and hijacked the discussion to GAIN ATTENTION.


Because you're immature and a bit of a ******.

 

The owners came out and said it.

 

The fact with the two players is though its not an issue, as they can easily sell them so why bother with a clause if your offloading them anyway. The owners are biased, the managers are biased, the players are biased, the agents are biased and yep we as fans are biased. Unless youve seen the contracts you will never know.

 

You're boring me already.

 

'Whitey'

'Their'

 

Lyke.

 

This is really out of order Phil.Fact!

 

Why?