Am I the only one who thinks selling Golbourne is a good thing?

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by fired, Aug 29, 2013.

  1. fir

    fired Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Messages:
    16,626
    Likes Received:
    12,702
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    First of all - profit on a player who is Okay this level....he's certainly not the world beater some folks seem to think he is.

    More importantly for me, he's not taking a midfielder's place in the starting line up. We need a replacement that isn't McNulty. Not sure about Kennedy.

    And if Mellis goes next, so be it. Whenever he is in the side we have to compromise somewhere else on the pitch. We have enough midfielders in the squad to be solid and creative, but we need the balance.
     
  2. JLWBigLil

    JLWBigLil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    50,853
    Likes Received:
    32,922
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Neither is he the Division 1 standard player others are claiming.
     
  3. cho

    chorley New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2012
    Messages:
    296
    Likes Received:
    0
    Depends on the fee for me.
     
  4. pompey_red

    pompey_red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Messages:
    13,633
    Likes Received:
    9,722
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Fareham
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    im with you fi, i dont think hes the player Flicker was talking about as being the best in the division, however he's certainly not the worst left back we've ever had on the other hand but if we get a decent fee i dont think an already weak defence will miss him
     
  5. Con

    Connor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2013
    Messages:
    6,454
    Likes Received:
    4,353
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    They aren't buying him on this years performances so far , and if we get a decent fee for a player who we are led to believe wants to leave , then it may be the best outcome
     
  6. Joe

    Joey Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,683
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Goole
    I'm not a fan of Goldbourne really. He is okay. But selling him can't be considered a good thing. Flitcroft has played him in every game this season, clearly thinking he is the number one left back/wing back at the club. Now we're are selling him . . . so unless there is another signing in the pipeline, a player is going to replace him who in Flitcroft considers to be not as good. That cannot be a good thing.

    Do we need the money? Is the wage bill too high?
     
  7. Gor

    Gordon Ottershaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    4,399
    Likes Received:
    3,024
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Old Town
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    If we replace him I don't think we'lll miss him at all. He poses no attacking threat at all and Flicker is determined to play him up the field. I don't think the replacement is already at the club though.
     
  8. Joe

    Joey Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,683
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Goole
    In all honesty, I'd rather have Noble Lazarus at left wing back BUT he hasn't played yet this season. Flitcroft must think he's not as good as Goldbourne so we must be either signing someone or he is going to 'weaken' the team.
     
  9. Mrs

    MrsHallsToffeerolls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2007
    Messages:
    27,248
    Likes Received:
    5,812
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
  10. Cap

    Capital Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,976
    Likes Received:
    808
    Location:
    LONDON SW
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I'm not too concerned about him leaving. You're right, he poses little attacking threat, as he can't beat his man. If he receives the ball wide left, he'll simply pass it square or more often backwards, as he hasn't the guile to go past his man.

    As a defender, that's a different matter, but I think it was a poor decision by Flicker to play him as a wing-back.

    We have the choice of Kennedy/McNulty/ or even Nyatanga at full back, with RNL wing back, as a far greater attacking threat
     
  11. MarioKempes

    MarioKempes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    40,155
    Likes Received:
    7,178
    Occupation:
    Project Manager
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    No, if we get a good price for him I think it's potentially a good bit of business too.
     
  12. BFC Dave

    BFC Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,966
    Likes Received:
    849
    Style:
    XenForo - Xenith Reds
    He ain't Baines. Either Leighton or Jim (one for the older posters)
     
  13. Hicksy

    Hicksy Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,629
    Likes Received:
    549
    Occupation:
    Remploy Account Manager
    Location:
    Barnsley, England, United Kingdom, 103126909727190
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Nope

    http://bbs.barnsleyfc.org.uk/showthread.php?195603-Shambles-of-a-club&p=1366242#post1366242
     
  14. M1 Tyke

    M1 Tyke New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,926
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    The only Tory in the village
    Location:
    Somewhere between Dirty Leeds and That London
    I think it's a great idea if it's for a decent fee and Flicker does something sensible to replace him....and I don't neccesarly mean bringing someone in from outside the club.
     
  15. Slacki

    Slacki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2013
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Ex-Rock Star
    Location:
    Chesham
    I can't see him being one of our top earners having signed from Exeter where they pay players in cheese.
     
  16. Jay

    Jay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    43,443
    Likes Received:
    32,144
    Location:
    On Sofa
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Depends how much we've got for him I suppose.

    But from the manager's interview it sounds like he wanted to go. When a player says that, the best thing you can do is agree on a price. No point keeping a player who doesn't want to be here.

    Kennedy and McNulty can play left back in a back four, so there's no problem there, but if Flitcroft wants to continue playing wing backs there's not many options on the left. We changed the system last season when Golbourne was injured as Flicker didn't fancy Kennedy in that position. RNL had a couple of goes at it and did OK, so maybe we're going with him.

    Golbourne was OK, but he was no Barnard or Thompson in that left wing back role and I'm not sure I can relate to a player who is first choice in a Championship team and wants to leave to join a League 1 club. Wolves are not assured of promotion this year. Maybe he's not that confident in his own abilities, so didn't think a more successful Championship club would come in for him and chose to take the money rather than continue the upward trajectory of his career. However much money Wolves are paying and whichever way he spins it, he's taken a step back.
     
  17. Zemaj

    Zemaj Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2012
    Messages:
    1,551
    Likes Received:
    104
    Location:
    Individual Brilliance Zone
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I feel strangely indifferent to him leaving. He was good but rarely spectacular. Hope we got a good fee for him mind.
     
  18. Dja

    Django Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2013
    Messages:
    12,304
    Likes Received:
    9,435
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I think he's the sort of solid unspectacular player that you'll only start missing when he's gone.

    In my opinion he's far superior to the last 2 regular left backs we had - Mceveley & Kozluk and he's a hell of a lot better than Kennedy and any others that might play there (McNulty, RNL Nyatanga etc)
     

Share This Page