Indeed which is worrying as ****. Im willing to give it time though if its given chance to settle and we get rid of 3-5-2. Time will tell but the foster and hassles time needed to be called and was.
What puzzles me is the fact that it is common knowledge he cannot play every game due to back problem, and certainly couldn't do Saturday-Tuesday. He was at best a bog-standard lower league clogger, yet people still talk about him like he was Beckenbauer.
Good does not equate to the statistics. Yes we stayed in the league but is that really our aim every year because if it is even with limited resources we may aswell all pack the fcuker in.
Keep banging that drum and ill join you if nowts changed by xmas. Otherwise it needs a fair crack besides being a ******* shambles right now.
He had his fair share of shaky spells in his Barnsley career but on the whole I thought he was fantastic and seemed to get better with age. I'm really surprised by this latest development as I thought he'd be excellent at Lge1 level. Maybe there's more to it than meets the eye.
I agree it does but you are harsh on Bobby who could still offer something IMHO, not least of all experience.
I dont think its harsh to believe hes past it, most of this board are far too generous with their love to him but its all about opinions.
Of course it is but I've not seen signs of him being past it. Plus we could then play Wiseman at his best position. RWB Foster, yes, at this level. Saying that watch him sign tomorrow.
As far as im concerned if he was as good as everyone thinks, flicker would have no choice but to start him. Simple as that for me, none of this other ****** about agendas etc if he was the bees hed be on the team sheet.