Backing off, letting a player back him into the box, refusing to tackle and resulting in a goal. Am I been harsh or is enough,enough? How many goals are we conceding from right back positions with the the lord sat on the bench?
We were caught out by a short corner for their first, players not concentrating. Was disappointed with McCourt yesterday. It was the first I'd I'd seen him, and he didn't have enough involvement in the game for me, strolling around at times. He looks to have oodles of skill, but he didn't get forward enough at all, to do his stuff in their half, or even the final third. He didn't make much of an impact, and Mellis also disappointed me. I thought Cyzwka was a much livelier option when he came on in 70th minute. Still, it was a decent performance yeaterday, but a few wins are now essential to kick start things.
Watch the first goal again, super-fan, and see if you can spot a slight flaw in your argument. The culprit has got number 42 on his back and a proper beard unlike the proverbial scapegoat.
It seems to deflect off Perkins and go to the only place we didn`t want it to, element of luck for me.
Which is why I prefer our skilful, creative players doing their stuff in areas which cause problems for the opposition. Rather than trying to make them defend and do things they can't do properly and, in the end, causing problems for us.
Exactly. Paddy ought to have been on halfway in case we broke. But no. We have all eleven men back. Wiseman SHOULD have been where Paddy was. But no. He was marking Clint Hill. For fcuks sake. Do we ever learn?