are we above or below Yeovil.... did we beat Forest that's a no and a no I think you will find. OK we may not be worse than Yeovil, but I will say we are certainly not any better either.
And will remain so until we are able to keep up the same intensity for the full 90 minutes, not just the first 45!
Today was a derby game where nobody gets time on the ball, at least for a while. But I agree, when space was available later on, we had no drive in midfield at all. Wednesday are a team of athletes rather than footballers though - I think. They robotically carried on doing their stuff, and it became easier for them as we tired. There'll be fewer teams coming with their collective lungs. But there'll be more coming who are far too slick for M'Voto, Kennedy, Wiseman, Perkins etc.
The biggest frustration is that we are a better team than we are seeing right now. If we can start to play for 90 minutes rather than just 45 and if Flicker stops making the same basic mistakes we will be ok.
Can you explain the apostrophe there? Is it to avoid expletive deletive? Otherwise we could speculate. e.g. Hobnob
I can't see us surviving, just don't see where the wins are going to come from. We're not clinical in front of goal (would have scored more today if we were), don't get enough men in the box to feed on the crosses (at least two great crosses today and only Pederson in the box, COG nowhere to be seen) and can't defend for anywhere near 90 minutes.