Tom Kennedy

Someone please explain.....................WHY???

 

Didn't play too badly today, in my opinion. Put in a few decent balls which nobody capitalised on, again.

Must be difficult having somebody in front of you who puts in so little effort to defend/track back.

 

I haven't been today. Who played ahead of TK?
Because it was Mellis' fault for TK being gash previously. Who is it now?

 

This. Put one particularly cracking ball in that Pedersen should have got on the end of. The amount of criticism he gets is unwarranted and I can't understand why you'd single him out today.

Closer to MOTM than our worst player.

 

Paddy, who refused to run when he didn't have the ball.

 

McCourt.

 

Oh, I see. Makes sense.

 

He seemed to be getting plenty of stick from our own players today.

 

Could it be because he's the only one of our back four who can accurately kick it forward, to O'Grady who stands in the same spot every time up the left touchline?

Whilst we bypass midfield because we have 2 hod carriers in there rather than artistes.

Kennedy was in my opinion just about motm (Mvoto did well until he strayed over halfway)

But don't let all this put you off. Please carry on with witchhunt thread no. 367

 

We have a winner. First 'witch hunt' reference. Well done.

 

People are critising Kennedy so much because he has the ball so often, what about O`Brien or Wiseman who were worse than Kennedy?

 

All the back four played well and so did O'Brien in his defensive, covering capacity. Three absolute sitters of headers missed - M'Voto, O'Grady and the easiest of the lot Cywka in the last minute from 5 yards out with the net gaping plus a missed penalty. We should have won that game at least 4-0 and then nobody would have been moaning but yet again, we're not putting **** teams to bed. Wednesday, Charlton and now Donny should all have been well beaten.

 

Tell us why not, he made one mistake today, we coud say 'why Fox' 'cos he did bugger all today. ..

Get off his back, his positive contriburions today have been pointed out above, McCourt was a liability today but you havent said much about him. ..

 

Well said! !!! Someone with sense...

 

Tyke1

Someone please explain.....................WHY???

 

I thought he had a decent game, he put some great balls in but nobody bothered to get on the end of them and it was his ball through that ended up winning us a penalty.

 

Cant win, got slated a couple of weeks back when I said he had a decent game, I like him especially last season but this season except 1/2 games he has been poor IMO. Yet he don't get dropped, we have Reuben who could play there, or Wiseman could play there

 

You shouldn't care what other people think of your opinion.

 

If you don't grasp why this may be a witch hunt, then read the first post on this thread.

Does that seem an appraisal of his performance today?

Or is it an apparent contribution to previous posts regarding his supposed ability?

Thus may it not be a witch hunt?

Why does it not state what he did today?

And by the way he was good today.

Try asking on here - see what they say. I trust em.

 

All opinions. People see things differently. It's easy to understand. I thought he was just ok, did some decent stuff, did some very poor stuff too. But most of the team did. As for the original post, I just see a post from somebody who doesn't think he is good enough. I don't think he is that good to make you think it's a silly opinion. Witch hunt? No.