well this one is, I am totally fed up to the back teeth of us setting up defensively with 1 up front!! especially against teams with a defence like Millwalls.
Its the first time we've done it for ages you muppet, actually i can't think of the other time we've done it this Year. What a plonker
Flicker obviously doesn't care much if he gets fired because if he did he'd be trying to win the game like the second half of last season.
I'm sorry gally but thats a silly comment, hes trying to say we always do it when we quite simply don't. dreamboy on the other hand can't seem to remember last season. Our plan was 0-0 at half time. Keep it tight. Not to play well.
That's rich coming from somebody that chucks his toys out of the pram at the first bit of criticism . Here's a tip son, either learn a bit of civility or prepare to get some back. Did I give a timescale? just said I would rather us not set up in a negative manner when we have a good chance of 3 points
We still do have a chance of three points. Someone else said Mellis had the BEST chance in the first half.
If only the first 45 counted, we'd be mid table on 19 points with 9 clean sheets. Unfortunately, we are the worst side in the Football League in the second 45. Cos we're reight fit.
so? just think what we might have achieved with even just one more striker up front. Either way just because you don't agree doesn't excuse the personal abuse
Under this coaching staff what was our BEST run under. Keith hill September through to December, 4231 or for you ONE striker. Scored lots of goals. Kept a few clean sheets..... How many of the top teams in the world national or club side play with two up front??? Spain, Brazil, Bayern, Barca, Real madrid, Athletic Madrid play 4231/433
you don't give up do you? So we had most of the possession, that kind of stat without seeing the game means nothing but you could argue we might have used it to better effect with a more attacking line up. So that aside BBC stats and your opinion means the personal stuff was justified does it?