Banning someone because they have a opinion? He's not abusive or offensive, people with no sense of hummer gets offended by him.
If folk were warned about windups I'd have been banned for posting about a helicopter pilot 5 years ago.
Once again, I find myself jumping to the defense of someone who I have never replied to. I find his stuff immature, very difficult to read and not worth my time and effort. However, he seems very popular on here, because every thread he writes produces loads of replies, that is, he generates lots of interest from those who like to prove that they are cleverer than he is. Those replies are like oxygen to him. They provide him with a platform, notoriety and a following. Those who want to stop this situation should stop replying to his ramblings. However, unless he is libelous or begins trolling etc, then I think to ban him is to deny him his freedom of speech, which even if he has nothing of value to say, is a right that he should not be denied.
I quite enjoy my jousts with him so have no intention of ignoring him. Don't want him banned either, think that is a bit childish in itself unless something libelous has been said. Carry on, nothing to see here.
He is like a dodgy block of flats. You can see there is a power supply. But unfortunately it does not reach every floor.
he's a twonk, but a thoroughly harmless one. the way some people on here bait him, then whinge about his behaviour and call for bans, is every bit as weird as his mental rants. there are people on this board who are straight up cyber bullies. not cool. if he's broken the forum rules, i'll trust the admins to act on it. everyone else needs to chill the **** out. it's christmas
