Stephen Dawsons Penalty Claim yesterday

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Tyke1, Dec 27, 2013.

  1. Tyk

    Tyke1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2009
    Messages:
    6,954
    Likes Received:
    2,749
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    A Blatant Penalty, how the Referee or Linesman didn't see that I will never know.
     
    Tyke1, Dec 27, 2013
    #1
  2. oss

    ossettred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,522
    Likes Received:
    132
    Location:
    somewhere confused
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    To be fair at the time I didn't think it were a penalty
     
    ossettred, Dec 27, 2013
    #2
  3. Mr C

    Mr C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    24,964
    Likes Received:
    15,739
    Occupation:
    Saving the world.
    Location:
    Wentworth
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Divided opinion. Everyone agrees it was outside the box, I still can't see a foul.
     
    Mr C, Dec 27, 2013
    #3
  4. tosh

    tosh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    6,294
    Likes Received:
    3,158
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    North Sea
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Neither did I, cos it were obstruction surely and obstruction is an indirect free kick offence. Penalties are direct free kicks.
     
    tosh, Dec 27, 2013
    #4
  5. cam

    cambstyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2012
    Messages:
    1,438
    Likes Received:
    195
    Location:
    Cambridge
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    For it to be obstruction, when I was a referee, the defender does not move!!
     
    cambstyke, Dec 27, 2013
    #5
  6. BFC

    BFCFan4Life Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    5,523
    Likes Received:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Halifax
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Outside the box, possibly a foul.
     
    BFCFan4Life, Dec 27, 2013
    #6
  7. Geo

    GeorgeRobledo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2006
    Messages:
    2,639
    Likes Received:
    812
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Top of Birdwell Obelisk.
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    No such thing as indirect free kick for obstruction now...a foul is a foul...
     
    GeorgeRobledo, Dec 27, 2013
    #7
  8. sadbrewer

    sadbrewer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Messages:
    10,223
    Likes Received:
    5,237
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    George Robledo is right..obstruction has gone from the rule book.
     
    sadbrewer, Dec 27, 2013
    #8
  9. sel

    selby Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    2,742
    Likes Received:
    1,789
    Location:
    Selby
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    On the subject of obstruction why do refs never give free kicks when players are shielding the ball out of play for a goal kick with no intention of touching it? Always annoyed me that!!!
     
    selby, Dec 27, 2013
    #9
  10. tosh

    tosh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    6,294
    Likes Received:
    3,158
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    North Sea
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    As far as I know, it is still in the laws of the game. They may not apply it, but they could if they wished.
     
    tosh, Dec 28, 2013
    #10
  11. sadbrewer

    sadbrewer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Messages:
    10,223
    Likes Received:
    5,237
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Look in Fifas rule book..it's online...the offence does not exist anymore...stupidly in my opinion
     
    sadbrewer, Dec 28, 2013
    #11
  12. tosh

    tosh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    6,294
    Likes Received:
    3,158
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    North Sea
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    It is still there, in law 12 under indirect free kicks. Read the bit about impeding the progress of an opponent (they have merely removed the word obstruction, but it is the same offence).
     
    tosh, Dec 28, 2013
    #12
  13. sadbrewer

    sadbrewer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Messages:
    10,223
    Likes Received:
    5,237
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    you and I know it's the same offence but in Fifas wisdom it is definitely not..it is a non offence...having said that I wouldn't have given Qatar the world cup,so it shows how little commonsense I have. ;D
     
    sadbrewer, Dec 28, 2013
    #13

Share This Page