Dawson or Hassell?

Another simple question.

 

dawson, got real drive thats needed in midfield

 

Like both but not a hard question for me... HASSELL! Would be same answer if you put him against any of our players!

 

Dawson for me

 

Tha should take up fishing.

 

Hassell. Actually wins headers, tackles, can pass off either peg, reads the game, holds position. Basically, he's the better option as the holding/enforcing midfielder screening the back four.

 

so you think Hassell are best player?

 

Hassell. Dawson is absolute gash.

 

Not got my rod, Bob. Seriously. Without Frimpong and Mellis, and with Shea (in my opinion) offering less than **** all since he arrived, I think both simple 'either or' questions are very relevant.

 

I think he's the most consistent player we have and has been for last 10 year. Someone put a stat on here t'other day (think it was Whitey?) that we've only lost 10 games when he's started a game or somet like that?

******* love the ginger tw.at!

 

It's not mate.

Hassell if we're playing in a 3 in midfield and he can just sit deep.

Dawson if it's a 4.

 

I think he's our best player in that particular position. Dawson is never a holding midfielder. He's more 'box to box'. But I don't believe his recent form merits a regular start. Same goes for Shea.

Only my opinion, though. Others are available and just as credible.

 

Not the question I asked?
Do you think hes the best player (now at the club)?

 

A bit more ground bait.

 

Dawson is never a holding midfielder. He's more 'box to box'. 100% agree.

 

Hassell.

 

On Saturday it was Frimpong holding, Mellis pushing on wasn't it? So that's two centrally. You telling me Bobby can't play the Frimpong role?

And you'd prefer Dawson in a two with an attacking midfielder (Mellis, Lawrence, Cywka, whoever)?

 

Hassell wiart a shadder.

 

Are you going with a flat 4-4-2, Phil? Jennings and Shea wide, and Dawson and Digby central?

 

Paddy.