I find them offensive, upsetting and degrading to women and in fact an affront to moral decency. He's entitles to his own opinion but it's time to stand against this misogynistic and frankly disgusting point of view. Another poster got banned recently for calling another poster a spaz which was probably the right thing to do. At least that poster acknowledges he was wrong to use the term whilst I'd very much doubt the aforementioned Young Nudger won't do the same. I therefore call upon Site Admin to ban him for at least a period if time to at least show that these views are not acceptable And to the poster himself, I've posted this here to show you that people are prepared to stand up to you and for things they believe in. If you want to take exception go ahead but I'm not hiding by just reporting this to Admin in a faceless way.
I've always found Nudger to be a good egg when I've met/spoke with him at Oakwell or in the No7. But his views on here are extreme to say the least. Whenever a sensitive subject is raised, I always expect Nudger to post the diametrically opposed opinion to the rest of the board. Which makes me think he's doing it to get a rise out of folk. Strange whichever way it goes. I'll leave admin to decide on bans for folk though. I kind of enjoy people getting put in their places by right minded folk myself, rather than ejecting them. But hey ho.
I propose that we ban all people on here that use abusive language against other posters. I also believe in the right to have individual views that are not main stream and those of national newspapers and television reporters.
If the cap fits. I stand by what I called you. Free speech eh? You've been proven before to be a bully. And as for taking a non mainstream view, as though that's some kind of excuse, I've read about the case and made up my mind. I'd also add that it's quite ironic you stand against mainstream/media views when you've become a UKIP turncoat, no doubts because of the coverage they get.
Chef Evans' victim is 'a disgrace'. She should be locked up not him. Women are to blame for being raped. Amongst others
The views of Redstar and the like............are the same restrictive views and censorship views of people like those seen climbing into the car in Paris
As the OP says .......... and the kids go OMG! That's w4nk at best! Folk have been banned for far less!
Yer on thin ice with................'Women are to blame for being raped' That was never said by me...........and you foooking know that it wasn't !!!
I think not. There a clear difference between satire and the ill informed and offensive ramblings you've posted. You are a joke.
I quote your post "In my opinion - its the womens fault for letting herself get into such a stupid position" Pretty much says it's her fault...
Have a word with yourself. Hopefully a serious one that includes the words 'pr1ck', 'knobh4ad' and 'fick as fook'
NO I FOOOKING DIDN'T !!! I said she was a disgrace to get so drunk I didn't say that 'drunk girls are to blame for getting raped'............that's a lie from someone who is scrambling around trying to throw mud and missing the target (again). Rape is rape if the woman is drunk or not...............but in this case I don't believe that she was raped - more than two people that were there said she wasn't raped. She was that drunk she seems to have given consent and she dosent even know that she had........although CCTV suggests that she wasn't drunk at all
I assume you mean me. I don't need to scramble about to sling mud at you. You posted "In my opinion - its the womens fault for letting herself get into such a stupid position" Explain what you didn't or did mean then?
So, using that logic, if you and Tarn Tyke raped a girl who was pissed, but you both said it never happened, would that make it ok?