Serious question now lads, was flicker given enough time? I liked flicker and thought he would have done a good job given time...
I agree. After what he did for this football club I think he was treated very unfairly. Danny has had 14 months and we've been appalling 95% of that time period. So if someone can please explain to me why he deserves more time that would be appreciated.
Flickers downfall was sticking by his players who managed to keep us up. So at the time i think it was probably the right time to let him go. We just appointed the wrong man, but we didn't have a choice really, there was nobody else at the time.
Martin woods Liam Lawrence Frimpong Proswitch Ian turner Brek Shea Signed by who? How did they turn out?
We should never have got shut of Hill. I said it at the time and I say it now. We were going down with him but he would have rebuilt us properly in League 1 and had us playing good football. He knows what he wants from his team unlike a manager like Wilson who chops and changes and is never comfortable with formation, players and tactics. If it drops for Wilson after loads of changes then he'll look good but give me Hill anytime
Wilsons stats are no better than Hills in the bottom 2 divisions and they get even worse when he managed in the top 2 divisions. Not backing Keith Hill but I just don't see the evidence that Danny Wilson is the better manager
I think Danny's found Keefs old turd polishing kit. However there are no instructions so Danny's stuck with a pile of turds he can't seem to shine.
What are you talking about. Mvoto was a rock yesterday. He gave his all to keep it 0-0 and the goal conceded was nothing to do with him.