Is that supposed to prove that china, or oriental countries, are the biggest gamblers? It fails if so.
Google it, read up on it, and make up your own mind, I could link you up to sites but then I'd be accused of finding articles to prove my point, just research it and draw your own conclusions, if you're really that bothered, but don't just dismiss something if you don't know much about said subject, which I'd assume you don't with the way you are responding to my posts. But if you do look it up try to do so with a open mind as best possible.
But that is what we're asking you to do. Spend the day in a busy town centre bookies. You'll realise that the people you're referring to are a minority. The biggest players are generally white, British men. Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Haha. You telling me to open my mind is right up there with you giving advice last week on how to respond to people. You've taken this thread away from the initial point too, classic tactics. It was irrelevant to say that they are Chinese who play the machines in the bookies, unless you were being derogatory. And you've still not explained how you know they are Chinese as opposed to many other nationality they could be (including British). See people as people is what I'm saying.
I know nothing about it but if it was just investments that went wrong then that's not illegal? I think he did actually invest their money and then lost it, rather than running off with it.
The way I understood it was he claimed he was investing yet he was actually keeping the money for himself. So he'd take an investment off one player keep the majority and pay out another player with the rest. The same cycle continued until eventually the pot run out. What he was doing surely cant have been legal. I'm clueless with anything like this though.