I can remember us been linked with him in summer wendsday and reading were linked earlier this month http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2016/01/0...ld-wednesday-target-rotherhams-clarke-harris/ so doubt we would be in for him if sam left
Not when they once gave him away Oh and he'd need to be a lot sharper to play any higher than he is now
Are you seriously suggesting that to give something away and then a couple of years later buy it back for £1.2million is good practice?
Even if he gives the performances that helps take them where they want to be? Would you cut off your nose to spite your face? On second thoughts don't answer that.
That's a fair point. Still not good practice is it? On ther other we sold Hammill at a profit and got him back for free
But that implies him being the same "product" that left them having had a string of semi successful loans he's now a proven goalscorer so yes it absolutely is good practice in every conceivable way.
But that implies him being the same "product" that left them having had a string of semi successful loans he's now a proven goalscorer so yes it absolutely is good practice in every conceivable way.