Fletcher for 12 months, or Bradshaw signed on a three year deal. Who would you choose? I think it's a no brainer really. As much as I like Fletcher and think he'd do very well in the Championship, Bradshaw would be a great addition for us.
I was saying this morning to a mate of mine who supports Leeds, that Fletcher is a fantastic player. But you're getting a raw talent who is still learning his trade for a short period of time. I think given the choice, I'd like to see a permanent player in, whether it be Bradshaw or someone else. Bradshaw is a proven goalscorer who won't come cheap. But he is the sort of player that 80 or so teams in the football league are after. Now Bradshaw and Fletcher, that would give me confidence for the season Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
If was asked this a decade ago I'd say bradshaw. But as players move when they want now I'd say Fletcher
Bradshaw was very disappointing in both legs of the play offs. Think he would struggle with the step up. Therefore, Fletcher for me. Sent from my iPhone
Bradshaw. I really rated Fletcher, and he was improving every game, but he's as proven in the Championship as Bradshaw is. Ideally, and unrealistically, I'd have both. I'd prefer us to bring in somebody on a three-year deal, than a loan, or we'll end up in this same situation trying to re-sign them all in twelve months time.
Both, but if limited to one, Fletcher. Bradshaw is a slightly less good version of Winnall, Fletcher brings something different.
Opinions I think Bradshaw is a better all round player than Winnall quicker and can play on his own up front.
Fletcher for me as I think he has Championship pace and touch, in particular and is a good finisher. Although have only seen Bradshaw a few times aside from the stats.
Don't know enough about Bradshaw to comment, other than he's been such a stand out player against us that I don't recall him
