I don't think we'll leave afterall

Not sure what point you are trying to make there?

 

That I don't get out much!

It does sound a bit cosmic!

 

To be honest I don't think anyone thought we could cherry pick. It simply comes down to economics, no one did trade with us as a charity. They did it because they made a profit in doing so. Does anyone really think that profitable business will cease because we are not part of the EU. Yes new trade agreements will need to be agreed that is what the 2 years negotiations are about, but to suggest it will cease is absolute rubbish.

 

Haha, I like it

 

Depends who you listen to, there are numerous very successful millionaires / billionaires backed Brexit. Dyson, Tim Martin and numerous other top entrepreneurs say leaving is the best option.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...preneurs-tell-Britons-to-vote-for-Brexit.html

http://www.cityam.com/243832/sir-james-dyson-eu-referendum-remain-would-act-self

http://news.sky.com/story/wetherspoons-boss-on-brexit-doom-mongering-10500045

 

We do agree that debate here is futile. what ever your believes are, no one on a forum will change your mind. How ever your remark of the non voters is equally futile. I was one of those, I registered but did not receive my postal vote in time. so if you use a proportional representation assuming the trend of voters would continue, it suggests that the majority would have been greater. I really don't want to get involved in that discussion as it is hypothetical lets just agree to disagree. What I will say is that when we hold a national referendum and the losers say we are not going to abide by it. it is the beginning of the end.

 

We'll end up with free movement with a few small provisos, like anyone with a criminal record being able to be refused, in return for being in the single market.

 

It appears the vote was nothing to do with economics. Subsequent analysis shows that people voted Brexit because they want to take us back to a medieval England.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-36803544
OK perhaps a bit provocative but still an interesting set of correlations.

 

And the de-legitimising of the brexit vote continues - the report only studies white voters.

Here are some none white brexit supporters. They don't fit the popular narrative though...

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...ers-brexit-stoke-on-trent-eu-referendum-video

 

Its a article on the beeb.
Honestly expect owt else?
My missus isnt white. She voted leave.
As did her folks.

 

I think we will leave and we should. The democratic process was followed and it's what people voted for. It'll probably be an unmitigated disaster but people won't be in a position to moan about it or criticise the government as they did not follow relevant advice.

 

Its not clear which beeb article you mean. But if its the link I posted its about a piece of academic research.

I know a number of academics thinking of legally challenging the BBC bias. Because the BBC has to be seen to show all sides to an argument, they have been covering academic studies which are pro leave in spite of the fact that 95% of British academics and their research is clearly showing how damaging this will be.

No idea what the colour of your wife has to do with anything.

 

Flippin BBC..reporting what's going on. Quoting experts. What do we want from experts? Sick of hearing from them. Far better to get your information from The Sun. Plus there's always Page 3 to look at when your brain starts to hurt.
Ffs.

 

This is a fairly unbiased factual account of the situation you are in. This is no "scare story", the facts can be checked and their truthfulness confirmed.
I know certain people won't read, check or believe even facts they can check themselves, but here is your situation in a (rather big) nutshell. (He lied about 5 minutes though.)

http://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2016/07/14/everything-you-need-to-know-about-theresa-may-s-brexit