Did anyone watch this mornings discussion about how the rules of the game may change in future to prevent horrendous leg breaking tackles like the one Coleman suffered on Friday night? It was refreshing to hear Martin Samuel make specific reference to the Morgan/Hume incident and highlight it as an example where someone could have been killed but there was no subsequent retribution for the perpetrator of the violent act. It was reassuring to know that it's not just us that remember. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Didn't see it but a bit puzzled as to what rule change. The challenge was already against the rules as evidenced by the red card and I assume suspension.
It is good that he remembers but most likely it's because hes a West Ham fan and hates Sheffield United because of the Tevez affair.
What more changes can you make without making it a non-contact sport? Already a lot less tackling than there used to be.
Unfortunately there has always been leg breaks in football. Can't see what can be done about this. Thuggery in the game is a different matter. I give you Morgan.
It would be the end for me if they make it a non-contact sport. Every player that takes to the field knows the risks and accepts them (and insures against them). You have to trust refs (I can hear your laughter) to sort out the difference between thuggery and mistimed or overzealous challenges. If thuggery is the verdict then punishments should be much harsher. The clubs should also be punished so that it's not in their interest to allow (or encourage) players to be thugs. Anyone remember the Micky Buttler newspaper article "The Anatomy of a Footballer".
