Seen this on Ghanasoccernet.com maybe a load a ballocks but as we have seen it too many times lately it's hard not to believe.
I think this is the link CT. http://ghanasoccernet.com/ghana-def...r-rejecting-barnsley-contract-extension-offer
wouldn't it be nice if just the one time we said no , hecky on radio this morn saying we don't want to loose yids .
Oh well, that's virtually an admission that he's on his way. Replace "we don't want to" with "I'm resigned to losing cos I've been told to...".
He's still our player and captained the team last night, which, I would think, is the offer we made him as an extension. We can hold on to him until January and still get a fee, or until the summer and he could leave for free. A big difference now is that we don't need the money and he is worth more than the money being offered. Please don't do a SSW, BFC, and hold him to contract at least until January, even if he won't sign an extension. The obligation to act honourably towards the current contract accrues both to BFC, but also to the player.
Dont sell, stick him in reserves for the remainder of his contract, no football for a year, nobody will want to buy him after
I suppose that could be one way to deal with it, but who wants to hold on to a dissatisfied player.? Negativity as well as enthusiasm "rubs off" on those around him so if he does want to go we should sell him as far as I'm concerned but for no less than £2 million. I still harbour a hope that he accepts the new terms offered and runs out in the famous Red shirt as our skipper this coming season.!
Bar him from Oakwell if he doesn't want to play i.e. send him on gardening leave. Unless he has a social life with his team mates, and bearing in mind most of them he's never played with before, I'm not sure there'll be much capacity for dissent to spread. He can refuse to sign an extension but the fact remains contractually he is still a Barnsley player and leaves when we receive an offer for him which we're happy with and it's a club he wants to play for or, failing that, his contract expires and he is free to find another club. Either he plays for Barnsley on those terms or he twiddles his thumbs at home, keeping himself physically fit as best he can.
Huddersfield and Reading have put in bids for him . He'll probably earn 15k a week at either club. I reckon the best we can offer him is 5k a week . Adios amigos!
It's simple really. Once the club accepts an offer, he's gone. He'd be out of his mind not to. Why wait another year to leave when there's triple wages (at least) on the table now?
Oakwell at the minute is like the dfs sale it never ends there is only so much hecky and the fans will take with constantly rebuilding teams it will end in tears eventually
True. But now no club has had an offer accepted and as I see it it's business as usual regarding Yiadom
Business opportunity here: we can be the first team to have LED names on the backs of shirts so that anyone that has a good half can get their name changed to someone else's for the second half and go and play somewhere else. Basically our transfer policy at this stage.
This is one transfer situation I can't get my head around. I disagreed with selling hourihane but can understand why. Same with winnall. I don't think Roberts should have been sold but can understand the thought process behind it. But I honestly do not understand what is happening here. Hecky says publicly that that yiadom is for sale of the price is right. Surely that encourages him to want to leave to earn better money. He then said that yiadom deserves top wages and we will try to offer that. Seems a bit mixed messagey. On one hand pimping him out and on the other hand trying to increase his wage demands by saying he deserves top wages. Seems to me that you shouldn't try to get a player to sign a new contract at the same time you are trying to sell him
I've tried to take a pragmatic view of our transfer policy but it's wearing thin. A good recruitment policy has to have at least an element of retention in it. I really feel for Hecky.