442, 451......

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by pompey_red, Aug 5, 2017.

  1. pompey_red

    pompey_red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Messages:
    13,502
    Likes Received:
    9,507
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Fareham
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    we aren't good enough to play 1 up front, we aren't good enough to play 2 in midfield. Welcome 3-5-2. It's the future. (And also the past pop pickers).

    This post is sponsored by Conan.

    Ta.
     
    pompey_red, Aug 5, 2017
    #1
  2. ryhilltyke

    ryhilltyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    9,901
    Likes Received:
    287
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Occupation:
    Construction Worker
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    We definitely need 5 in midfield with the personnel we have.
     
    ryhilltyke, Aug 5, 2017
    #2
  3. Sup

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    54,809
    Likes Received:
    28,701
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    No we don't. Just because we have a squad containing a lot of midfielders doesn't mean we have to play them all. By that logic we definitely need 2 in goal because we have two keepers
     
    SuperTyke, Aug 5, 2017
    #3
  4. ryhilltyke

    ryhilltyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    9,901
    Likes Received:
    287
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Occupation:
    Construction Worker
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    So by your logic we should play 2 strikers even though they are in the squad by name only.
    We haven't 2 strikers that remotely come close to that billing.
     
    ryhilltyke, Aug 5, 2017
    #4

Share This Page