Jackson Starts

,

 

He was absolute gash in 99% of the games he played, the manager caused the problems though, he didnt pick himself, he was rubbish in every position he played for us!

 

Why dud he consistently get in the top three in motm polls ob this site

 

Why does that matter?

 

Well if he was as **** as the more vociferous would have us believe surely he wouldn't have had any votes

The same is happening with jackson, and its not fair on him

 

Did that actually happen?

 

If I am upsetting him by saying I don't think he's up to it he's weaker than I thought. He shouldn't give a **** what I think.

I really don't think that your recollection of meaningless POTG votes on here means he was actually any good; folks actually voted for Jean Yves Mvoto

 

Whats your point

 

Without a doubt.

 

That using a none too serious vote one here to somehow defend one of the worst laikers we've ever had (Wiseman) is laughable

 

Im quoting the only statistic that was published on here

 

I don't remember it (which doesn't mean it didn't happen of course) so do you know how many votes we are talking? The norm votes tend to get extremely few votes so just three from you, hemsy and young nudger could easily put somebody into third place

 

But it's a pretty meaningless one....

 

Is it meaningless because you disagree with it?

It seems to me as though this Wiseman statistic may well be unprovable.

Though it might not be far wrong, cos he was nowhere near as bad as is being made out.

Do those who thought Winnall was immortal wish to stick to their original assessment?

The latest poor soul to be singled out for abuse appears to be Potts.

It will worsen the more we lose.

If the ref hadn't added on a few extra minutes today there would have been none of this.

 

No it's meaningless as it's hardly a serious poll.

Ifs buts and maybes. If we could defend we'd have had a point. If we had clinical strikers we'd have had all three.

There's very little abuse. There's some comment that x players aren't up to the required standard but is that not allowed?

For the record, Wiseman was tosh. He didn't try and wasn't bothered as evidenced by his comments when Danny ****** him off.

 

I try and respect everyone's opinion.

I do also note how quickly their opinion changes on a weekly basis, when it comes to BFC.

 

Scott Wiseman was one of the worst players we have ever had. If someone rates him then I really don't care about their opinion on anything.

 

"You're right. I'm not qualified so why should I have an opinion.

Admin - close the board"

 

Are you on the spectrum? Serious question. I think you could be a sociopath.

 

Why do you always concentrate on my personality rather than the substance of my posts?

Is it too much to ask that you respond to what I actually say?

If you look at what I posted, I drew to your attention your problem with regard to respecting people's posts.

And now you seem to be trying to draw instead towards some defect in my personality. Again.

I understand that there are those who cannot countenance opposition to their utterances. And take each contrary opinion personally.

But this is a forum.

So it seems fair to me for you to take issue with what I say, rather than who I am.