Surely FFP would scupper big signings?

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by Mr Badger, Dec 20, 2017.

  1. Mr Badger

    Mr Badger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    10,033
    Likes Received:
    8,550
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Fillingham
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Good to live in a world of dreams but aren't we restricted by ffp? We may have the richest owners in the universe but if the FL say no then where does that leave us.
     
  2. pompey_red

    pompey_red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Messages:
    13,547
    Likes Received:
    9,593
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Fareham
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    We arent going to be throwing millions at this, there’s a plan in place, it may be upgraded but it’s still a plan. Hefty dose of realism needed I think.
     
    Brewery stand and fitzytyke2 like this.
  3. Plankton Pete

    Plankton Pete Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    9,297
    Likes Received:
    4,035
    Location:
    In hiding from the lynch mob
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Your question is hypothetical cos I'm not convinced our new owners are looking at investing £50m to overhaul the squad. But FFP is fairly toothless to clubs at our level. Typical penalties include fines and limiting Champions League squad sizes. Enough to make any team in the lower reaches of the Championship think twice.
     
  4. SirPsychoSexy

    SirPsychoSexy Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Messages:
    7,248
    Likes Received:
    270
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Upton
    Style:
    XenForo - Xenith Reds
    We will no doubt sign a few Nice players on free transfers.
     
    Spirit Ditch likes this.
  5. Terry Nutkins

    Terry Nutkins Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    15,195
    Likes Received:
    12,578
    Occupation:
    Music Producer/DJ/Promoter and Owner of Hush Hush
    Location:
    www.hushhush-events.com
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It’s going to be an interesting few months I think.

    I would imagine it’s somewhere in between the views of the masses on here. I don’t think we are going to go out and spend 15m on strikers and midfielders like Wolves had but it’s going to be a long way from a continuation of the same policy we have become accustomed to.

    At the end of the day these owners are investing because they want to see the rewards of premier league football. That’s going to take some reasonably heavy investment. Remember, in terms of FFP we are significantly in the Black with player sales. We could theoretically go out and spend 20m in the transfer window and still be fine with FFP. Again I don’t think this will happen, but they have scope to do it they deem it necessary.

    I’ll reiterate though that these people aren’t here to sit in the Championship. A Premier league push will take a significant investment. I think the model will continue but the net will be cast further than League 2.
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2017
  6. North Yorks Red

    North Yorks Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    16,527
    Likes Received:
    14,458
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Harrogate
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I think its going to be more a case of a combination of being able to get decent/ good players in not paying mega bucks but finally being competitive on the wages front so not only can we get them in but we aren't a soft touch anymore when other clubs come knocking. Plus theres the loan thing.
    Exciting times though!
     
  7. MexboroughTyke

    MexboroughTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,545
    Likes Received:
    3,892
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    FFP is a load of rubbish. The owners could use one of their companies to sponsor something, a stand, the shorts, Toby Tyke's forehead, etc, and put money in that way.
     
    Django likes this.
  8. Harry Hough

    Harry Hough Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    Messages:
    4,851
    Likes Received:
    2,218
    Location:
    Lost!
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The new owners will have their own "Plan" which, my guess is, will be similar to the one we have in place but with a year-on-year increase in financial input meaning that we will see a gradual increase in the quality of signings. Baby steps rather that a headlong gallop to the Premiership.
     
  9. wak

    wakeyred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    9,880
    Likes Received:
    8,656
    Location:
    the clues in my imaginative online moniker
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Yeah, you are allowed £13 million losses averaged out over 3 seasons excluding Youth and stadium development - so we redirect maybe another £2 million there, plus we have surplus from sales so maybe in theory another £10-20 million, so over the next 3 seasons we could probably get away with spending £55 million - assuming we sell some more players for profit that obviously increases. Anything the club does to increase revenues - ticket sales, sponsorships (which are supposed to be assessed at a fair rate) can also be added to that.
     
  10. I'm Spartacus

    I'm Spartacus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    7,125
    Likes Received:
    3,778
    Occupation:
    Missionary
    Location:
    Crime Central (Sheffield)
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    FFP is beginning to bite. Look at our dear neighbours in S6, couldn't sell any of their vastly overpaid players during the summer and subsequently didn't buy anyone to improve their under achieving team, despite King Tuna having his name plastered on shirts and every square inch of the Rust Bowl.
     
    Merde Tete likes this.
  11. Wat

    Watcher_Of_The_Skies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Messages:
    9,324
    Likes Received:
    5,233
    Location:
    Leeds
    Style:
    Barnsley
    I hope not.
     
  12. John Peachy

    John Peachy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    17,471
    Likes Received:
    17,187
    Occupation:
    The littlest hobo
    Location:
    Leeds, United Kingdom
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I can't see loads of money being spent on transfers.

    Would expect to see ground improvements, to at least get us up to a capacity of say 25k, with some better facilities, hopefully a supporters bar.
    Improved scouting in long run & a bit of money to bring in some much needed experience on the pitch.
    Overall they must like what they see, but see a potential for growth.
     
    Kettlewell and fitzytyke2 like this.
  13. blivy

    blivy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2011
    Messages:
    5,602
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Manchester
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    They’ll want a return on their investment, so they’re not going to be splashing the cash.
     
  14. pompey_red

    pompey_red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Messages:
    13,547
    Likes Received:
    9,593
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Fareham
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    The only way to get an ROI is to spend a few bob, they haven’t bought us to sit in league one. I really think it’s going to be a gradual spend though, I’d be very very surprised if we spent a few million on big name players.
     
    Mike Lowry likes this.
  15. joh

    john coucom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2017
    Messages:
    2,512
    Likes Received:
    1,903
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    There are ways round ffp if they were to use there company to sponsor the naming of the ground they could put say 10 million into the club to be used as transfer collateral I think that could be used towards ffp
     
  16. Googs

    Googs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    8,474
    Likes Received:
    383
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Wilthorpe
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    FFP is a complete joke, how can PSG afford £200m on a player, on top of everything else they've spent? Hypothetical anyway as I can't see ridiculous fees like Wolves etc have spent.
     
  17. and

    andy67 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    320
    Likes Received:
    92
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    We’ve got a Chinese and Indian investor within the consortium.
    By marketing to the countries mentioned we can possibly open a revenue stream but to comply it must be a reasonable amount.
    We couldn’t get away with a £100 million shirt sponsorship for one season but we can identify the top earners in the league and match them I’m sure. For how much we’ve had previously it will still be a move forward.
    Like it’s been mentioned though big signings not going to happen but at least we’ll pay competitively so if we drop lucky with some signings should be able to hold on to them or get a market value
     
  18. Archey

    Archey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    26,094
    Likes Received:
    21,668
    Location:
    A big massive boat
    Style:
    Barnsley
    I don't think we're going to be in any trouble of breaching FFP. Barring our connection with Nice, I can't see us altering too much in terms of how we approach transfers, maybe just a little more freedom in tying down players and retaining our better ones.
     
  19. Marlon

    Marlon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    23,677
    Likes Received:
    14,562
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    HERE.
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Yes they can but the debt doesn’t go on the club , that’s the point
     
  20. MexboroughTyke

    MexboroughTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,545
    Likes Received:
    3,892
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    I've no idea what you're getting at, if I'm honest.
     

Share This Page