Having a slight disagreement with a mate over this. Gonna let the BBS chime in on the argument Based on each player's best season with us I've gone with (4-4-2): Müller Stones - Mawson - Roberts - Yiadom Vaz Tê - Hourihane - Scowen - Hammill Winnall - McBurnie He's gone with (4-5-1): Steele Hassell - Stones - Moore - Williams Campbell-Ryce - Hourihane - Butterfield - Howard - Hammill Ferenczi Which of us is the most sane?
Your team is by far the best structured - your mate has tried to pick the best players and fit them in to a team - it makes no sense to play Hourihane Butterfield and Howard in the same team. Yours would romp the league by a distance
What about this unbeatable 11... Pollitt Brown - Edwards - Collins - Kennedy Shea - Frimpong - Mattis - Thompson - Treacy Mido PS.... OP's team selection. I'd probably swap out Scowen for Drinkwater...
You have a better team that your mate. Neither of you should have John Stones in because he didn't play enough games for us to warrant his inclusion.
Yours is the better team however I don’t think Vaz Te ever played right wing for us & he’s got Stones at centre back & I don’t think he played there more than twice for us
Which Williams has your mate picked!??!?!?!?!?!?! I don't care if its Robbie or Tom - either way he needs to be checked over by a medical facility ASAP.
The best team ability wise for me - Butland Trippier Stones Mawson Yiadom Hammill Drinkwater Hourihane Vaz Te McBurnie Rodriguez This would be my team of who was best for Barnsley - Muller Trippier Roberts Mawson Yiadom Hammill Howard Hourihane Vaz Te Winnall McBurnie
George Williams, I thought he was good in that team a couple of seasons ago, but he released for a reason ultimately