Source? Your post was heavy on what appear to be facts but it would help in making your point if you could link to bona fide sources that back up your argument.
I don't see Robinson as a politician though. Farage is a politician, as is Paul Golding. Robinson is just an extremist thug, who I'd put in the same category as Abu Hamza & other extremists, who have no real agenda, other than creating hatred and conflict. Supporters of Robinson have posted the two threads on here, on the basis of free speech & I feel I have the right to free speech as well to call it out for what it is. It's pretty clear what the thread is about, so if you don't want to get involved, that's fine. I can see many good posters on here have decided to leave it alone & I respect that too.
Actually you couldn't look at the stats in that way because the people who produced the reports said they shouldn't be taken at face value. Two groups were looked at - one was 75% Asian while second group was 100% White. Second stat doesn't even get mentioned ....
He's the head / founder of Britain First. It is a political organisation. I find his views abhorrent, but they do have policies. There is no way on Ronnie Glavin's earth any of them will be elected, as they well know.
Because Judith is worried about the nonces & the importance of free speech apparently. No racial motivation at all....
As far as I'm concerned it's a bag of racist sh!te. I do oppose censorship, so as much as I think they are destructive morons, they do have a right to have a voice. Where that impacts directly on individuals is where all these racist groups come unstuck. Intimidation, breach of the peace, incitement, etc are all covered under the law, whether it is Abu Hamza or Tommy Arsefucker.
You're right but at what point does an organisation become legitimate and at what point does it lose that legitimacy?
ISIS, the IRA and KKK are all political organisations - as was the National Socialist Party in 30's Germany. One even got elected and that turned out well No idea how you decide though - the Racists in the National Front and EDL believe they are legitimate fortunately most of them are thick as well but the smart ones are really dangerous
Care to eleborate any further??? A think you need to be careful in how you choose your description of me, does my OP relate to race, skin colour, origin, religion??? NO...... it dosent, I have 2 young children which terrifies me when I see what people types of people are walking our streets these days. As for basically branding me a racist you are wrong on many many levels, you can send your apology over the weekend. Cheers
You’re right to be worried about your children. I am worried about my children too. I want to protect them from peodophiles. As any good parent does. I also want to protect them from racists and the mind numbingly stupid morons that follow the EDL or actually think that Stephen Yaxley-Lennon has anything remotely insightful or worth listening too. As any good parent would.
Where in may statement am i calling you a racist? I'm just paraphrasing your original post. If you think the streets are safer with Robinson and the EDL I would have to ask why that would be the case? His methods are fascist by definition.
No racial motivation at all....[/QUOTE] Ok. Listen for what’s its worth I think TR is somewhat of a berk n yes he’s probably nothing more than a racist who tries to hide it through his crusade but you have to admit there is a real problem in this country with sexual abuse from most races, origins, religions etc and it needs stamping out. People agreeing that it needs fetching to the attention of the public dosent mean there fascists or avid lovers of the EDL, some people will carry agendas the same way TR does but for millions more it’s a way of sharing the expressions of what others dare to think or say but fear of being labelled.
There would be **** all left of the populace of Barnsley S Yorks , everyone’s a knob to someone else,opinions ey, what’s that saying, There’s nowt as queer as folk