https://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/foo...-profitability-and-sustainability-rules-66463 Interesting, one more step nearer oblivion for Wednesday and Derby and possibly Villa if they don’t go up
There's a Wednesday fan at work that bangs on about how clever of a man Chansiri is, numerous false companies set up and owned by him so he can pump more money into the club. A big one at Wednesday is apparently D Taxis, sponsors all over for that company even Wednesday fans haven't used the taxi firm.. Hopefully the EFL take this matter seriously, but I can see it been brushed away to be honest.
I thought that too. We're quick to slag them off for exploiting a loophole, but we still don't own our own patch cos we did almost the same thing...
Are we? I thought "options were being explored"? Nothing concrete has been mentioned...unless I've missed it.
Apart from the fact the club never got £80 million for Oakwell so they could cook the books when the Council and Cryne family acquired it. The clubs named are doing it to get round the rules BFC stick to.
How is it different? They needed money, we needed money. They sold it to (most likely) a shell company owned by their owner, we sold it to the council. In my eyes, the amounts and purchasers involved are irrelevant as the outcome is the same. Maybe I'm looking at it in overly simplistic terms?
From t'Chron. Conway said that a new chief executive would be appointed ‘in the next couple of months’ and added that a deal to buy the council’s half of Oakwell and the surrounding land was ‘in process’ but could not put a timeframe on it.
The Stars article says it all - it is not illegal but a loophole that is being “exploited” - the EFL should close this questionable loophole. I predict it will end in tears for Wednesday, Derby &/or Villa & everyone will feel sorry for a club with such “history” - actually, I won’t!
I don’t see how it’s any different from what Patrick Cryne did? The stadium was split from the trading football club and divorced from the entity. The owners of the football ground, who, very much like Chansiri, happened to also be the owners of the football club, then rent it back to the football club entity. It could not be any more identical an arrangement. The difference being apparently when we did it it ‘safeguarded the club’ whereas with Wednesday it’s a ‘last throw of the dice’. Right oh.
Cryne family are joint owners of the ground and club so technic Except Cryne didn’t do it Doyle did to raise the money to pay off the debt , Barnsley Council only came into the deal when Cryne took it over in order for a Wednesday type situation to not be possible and the Council gaining some control on future development of the site . Obviously times are different now and there’s a chance the Councils half of the ground company could be sold to the Cryne family or BFC’s other investors
Was a last minute thing to save Barnsley FC council saw football club was a flagship for the Town are joint owners and uses facilities for meetings. Council would like to sell there half . Patrick Cryne paid rent to himself and was taxed on it at a genourous rate as are the Cryne family or owners Only gainers at this moment seem to be the tax people.