So dad, you lost

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by Jay, Jul 14, 2019.

  1. Jay

    Jay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    42,309
    Likes Received:
    29,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    On Sofa
    Style:
    Barnsley
    No we drew.
    Tele says you lost.
    Well, we scored the same amount of runs as them, we had a playoff thing and scored the same amount of runs in that too, but someone somewhere at some time was asked to draw up some rules on something that nobody believed would ever happen and so they wrote any old crap down.
    So you lost.
    NO!

    Amazing TV. Fantastic entertainment. But it was a draw.
     
    Carlycu5tard, Rosco and Kettlewell like this.
  2. ark

    ark104 (v2) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    6,213
    Likes Received:
    1,561
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    York
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I take the point but you do have to decide the winner of a tournament somehow, and boundaries are at least a perceived marker of dominance in the one day game. Can also see the argument about wickets but in a time limited format they don't particularly have any more relevance. Wickets in hand don't get you anymore runs when 50 overs are up.

    I would also add that New Zealand knew in advance of the super over that they needed to beat England's score to win. I guess in the same way that a team knows they need to score more on away goals if they draw.

    That all said New Zealand were fantastic today and didn't get the rub of the green. Kane Williamson, who is an honorary Yorkshireman, should be a shoe in for overseas Sports Personality of the Year. But England have found a way to win today and I'm still as a high as a kite. What a game, what a day.
     
  3. Plankton Pete

    Plankton Pete Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    9,297
    Likes Received:
    4,035
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    In hiding from the lynch mob
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    No different to away goal rules, really.
     
    John Peachy and Journo Tyke like this.
  4. Redhelen

    Redhelen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2018
    Messages:
    37,105
    Likes Received:
    43,398
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    If I were a kiwi I'd feel a bit aggrieved buy the rules stated we ve won! Yay, our first cricket world cup.
     
  5. Loko the Tyke

    Loko the Tyke Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2005
    Messages:
    16,668
    Likes Received:
    17,691
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I’m a bit confused by this. What’s the issue? That boundaries counted as a deciding factor?

    As mentioned separately, no different to away goals.
     
    Bazza likes this.
  6. Jay

    Jay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    42,309
    Likes Received:
    29,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    On Sofa
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Since when did you get away goals in a one leg final?
     
  7. Jay

    Jay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    42,309
    Likes Received:
    29,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    On Sofa
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Good job we didn't have that rule in 66 or Germany would have won the world cup.
     
    Donny-Red likes this.
  8. Jay

    Jay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    42,309
    Likes Received:
    29,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    On Sofa
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Another super over?

    People on here have attempted to argue that it's no different to away goals, which it really isn't. You don't have away goals in the world cup final for a number of very obvious reasons.

    If you were trying to make it analogous with football it would be like the scores being level after the 5 initial penalties but instead of playing on through sudden death until one team had scored more than the other after the same number of penalties the victor was decided on something entirely arbitrary like the number of goals scored from open play or the number of free kicks conceded.

    Federer and Djokovic reached 12 games all in the final set so it went to a tie break. They didn't stop and hand the tournament to the player who'd won the most points with volleys or back hands.

    The winner of the tennis won more sets than their opponent. The winner of the football World Cup has always and will always have scored more goals than their opponent. The winner of the cricket World Cup did not score more runs than their opponent and as a cricket match is decided by who scores the most runs, they didnt beat them, it was a draw. It was fantastic entertainment but they really should have played until there was a winner, but they didn't.
     
  9. Ex Bournemouth Red

    Ex Bournemouth Red Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2011
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    In F1, if two drivers are tied at the end of the season do they have an extra Grand Prix, or work back on who won most races? Or do they call it a draw?

    At some point they must say enough is enough, and that is obviously after the super over in cricket. The rules were in place before the match started so not like they made it up as the game was happening.

    If we'd have finished on the same points as Luton, would we have been joint champions, or would you have accepted goal difference was the separating factor? Because you knew in the event of a tie that is what it can down to?
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2019
    Bazza likes this.
  10. Marc

    Marc Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2012
    Messages:
    27,873
    Likes Received:
    22,373
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Bottom line is both teams knew the rules before the tournament started.
     
  11. joh

    john coucom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2017
    Messages:
    2,431
    Likes Received:
    1,798
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Did,nt NZ lose the game by conceding a wicket in the super over rather than losing by scoring less boundaries
     
  12. Red

    Redblueunwhite Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    6,187
    Likes Received:
    5,977
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Would N Z felt sorry for us? Dout it very much, shame it wasn't against the Aussies.
     
    Stephen Dawson and Bazza like this.
  13. BFC

    BFChap New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2016
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Location:
    Rotherham
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I'd be surprised if that was true. Mostly because they didn't concede a wicket in the superover.
     
    Redhelen likes this.
  14. PLOBBY

    PLOBBY Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2013
    Messages:
    4,273
    Likes Received:
    3,148
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    keep yer nose out
    Location:
    Cave
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    if NZ had have won, it would have been equivalent to when Greece won the Euros. England were the best team in the competition and worthy winners.
     
  15. TitusMagee

    TitusMagee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2018
    Messages:
    8,771
    Likes Received:
    13,593
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Silkstone Common
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Erm yeah they did. Guptill was run out on the last ball. They finished 15-1.
     
    Rosco likes this.
  16. TitusMagee

    TitusMagee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2018
    Messages:
    8,771
    Likes Received:
    13,593
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Silkstone Common
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Lost by having fewer boundaries not wickets.
     
  17. Brush

    Brush Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    16,196
    Likes Received:
    14,993
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Ex-IT professional
    Location:
    Swadlincote, South Derbyshire
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Correct.
     
  18. TitusMagee

    TitusMagee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2018
    Messages:
    8,771
    Likes Received:
    13,593
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Silkstone Common
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Nope.... why would people be talking about this rule if that didn't even come into play?!

    BBC:

    Screenshot_20190715-062159_BBC Sport.jpg
     
  19. Brush

    Brush Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    16,196
    Likes Received:
    14,993
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Ex-IT professional
    Location:
    Swadlincote, South Derbyshire
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Hit a nerve there mate?
     
  20. TitusMagee

    TitusMagee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2018
    Messages:
    8,771
    Likes Received:
    13,593
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Silkstone Common
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Haha no, just not sure why you're saying something is correct when it clearly isn't?
     
    Rosco likes this.

Share This Page