Women's football was bigger than men's football up to about 1921 when the authorities banned? it. At today's match what % of the 31,00 were male/female ?
https://www.mancity.com/news/ticket...united manchester derby supporter information Thought the crowd should have been higher. Over three million live in the city and the men teams didn't have a game. Plus it was only seven quid to get in and you got three free under 16 tickets for that as well.
The main reason the attendance was 31,000 is that 31,000 people bought tickets because they wanted to watch the game. There was a million and one things they could have done with their weekend and they chose that.
I enjoy watching women's football but having both these teams conveniently parachuted in at or near the top of the football pyramid at the expense of other, established teams such as Doncaster Rovers Belles) doesn't sit right with me. Manchester United Women in particular should have been made to work their way up the leagues. Yes I get the argument that having the big teams in the top league helps promote the game but it still seems very unfair to the smaller teams.
Affordable professional football matches. That's what everyone wants. Apologies if I have come across as being anti women's football. I'm not.
No but I think the point you raise is a valid one. The difficulty for women’s football in terms of continued growth is retaining those supporters who would’ve otherwise gone to watch men’s football had there been a clash of fixtures.