I do know that their convictions were quashed on appeal yes, but you’re missing my point Donny, there’s a difference surely between being guilty and being proven to be. The Brighton Bomber he protested in solidarity with had his fingerprints all over the trigger device, didn't stop dear leader protesting his arrest or campaigning to have his sentence reduced did it ?? In what way do you think that this Doesn't show his support for ira terrorists. ??? As for your reference to the daily mail you all seem obsessed with it, and your reference again to nazism in response to me didnt go unnoticed
They’re not FACTS, they’re your knee jerk assumptions from reading heavily spun headlines in ‘newspapers’ funded or owned by those with financial interests in keeping Corbyn out of No.10. Be right....
I am being right MF, you only dismiss it as propaganda and spin because you don't care to hear about it. If it was all lies I’m sure that the party would have folk up in court, but it isn't. They are uncomfortable truths his support just doesn't want to face up to.
Never suggested otherwise. My point being its not just the usual right wing suspects who are sceptical of the EU and its direction of travel.
Please, I am waiting for your sources? I’m starting to think you don’t have any reputable sources at all and accepted the first website that popped up on google as fact!
Generally speaking, surely it’s to the credit of the campaigner if they defend someone who they feel has been subject to a gross miscarriage of justice and said conviction is ultimately overturned on appeal? For what it’s worth I’m not a fan of Corbyn (the man) but as leader of the Opposition he’s doing an excellent job of holding the Executive to account which is exactly what Parliament is designed to do. Unfortunately we live in a time where it matters not what’s being said but rather who has said it and I’d hazard a guess that if the roles were reversed and it was in fact Corbyn who was peddling the untruths from the Government benches, openly discussing disregarding the rule of law and proroguing Parliament then the pro Johnson, Rees-Mogg and Raab lot would be up in arms at the prospect of Parliamentary sovereignty being subverted in such a manner. This is party politics at its very worst and it’s people like us that’ll ultimately suffer as a result of it.
I dismiss it because whether you like Corbyn or not, he has spent his whole political career championing peace, decrying violence in any name and encouraging dialogue between those in conflict. Those are the real FACTS. Obviously this doesn’t sit well with the spin and untruths peddled by those with vested interests in keeping him from office. As I said, I’m no massive fan - I think Labour might have removed this sham government much earlier with someone else at the helm - but I will defend him fully against such ill- informed rubbish.
I think as an MP who works for his constituents and campaigns for causes (such as peace), he is one of the better ones. I am less convinced of his effectiveness as leading of the party, but I liked the policies in the last manifesto more than any other for years. Although I do like some of these from the Monster Raving Loonies:
There's nothing I’d like to see more than a Labour Party in government, but whilst ever its led by a marxis Worked for Trump.
You mean IRA sympathiser Trump https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...nths-before-ira-attacked-london-a6767601.html
You're wasting your time. We're still waiting for which EU laws THAT WERE FORCED ON US that he's against. Think that was 2 weeks ago. He gave some feeble response about catching fish or something. Still waiting Mr Trixster.
Hi friend, just google the topics suggested and take your pick, what I’m not going to do is post links for the raging lefties on here to label the sources as right wing media. There’s a plentiful amount of info in each topic if you take the time to look.
Yes thats him, I was admiring his tactic of playing pigeon chess with Hilary Clinton, a tactic that won him the presidency.
Hello, I have googled it and am unable to find a reputable source which concurs with what you were saying, so given that they are so plentiful I wondered if you could point in their direction? Given your post I suspect that I was indeed correct that you’re referring to some Bannon funded tripe and thus too scared to post it. Let me put it in terms you understand - you are chicken! TTSFC - totally spineless chicken.
I expect that the topic of migration will be raised by the other side when negotiating any FTA post Brexit. Free movement also works both ways albeit when it’s the British doing the moving they aren’t migrants they’re ex-pats.