Just pointing out that there’s nothing to get your knickers in a twist about. You seem desperate to ignore the truth about antisemitism in the labour party but want to get upset about a year old report from TM’s days as PM. Strange.
F fair enough . I was only questioning as you seemed to be on the threads I’ve seen anyway scrutinising labour more than Tory . Yes I agree with being critical of every party’s policies I was very critical of Blair and I was right. It seems logical now you’ve revealed you like to play devils advocate it just didn’t seem so to me anyway at the time . I’ll know in future posts where your coming from now .
Not read all the comments, had anyone got a link to what is actually written? Not what Corbyn or press or others say.
He's morphed into Laura Kuenssberg Then this denying attendance of any ministers at the meetings... Then no cabinet ministers.... except Liam Fox.....who happened to be the Secretary of State for International Trade at the time (slightly important in trade talks )
There’s nowt in it Pompey, old news, nothing to see here. But at least 10 labour mp’s resign over antisemitism and apparently its all a big fat lie. Anyway, fact is no one’s going to be swayed either way by any of it. I dont think we can trust any of them, once JC loses he’ll resign and hopefully labour can go back to being a party worth voting for M
but you haven’t voted for them since 1997. Why were they not worth voting for at any time since! But back to this, this is a lie then by labour? Because I’ve not seen any threats of legal action or any argument from anyone important who was at these meetings today. Johnson says it’s not true...he would, but he lies every time his lips move.
The unredacted document is available on the GuidoFawkes website. It confirms there is NO evidence to support Corbyn's claim. Just a poor attempt to deflect from yesterday's car crass interview on teh BBC. Not just Johnson telling porkies then . Too many on here call out non-labour supporters for believing anything the media reports anti-Brexit but lap up any anti Johnson reporst without checking the facts. Not a supporter of Johnson but teh hypocrisy of some on here is staggering.
It's not the full document on there apparently.....unsurprising seeing as it's a far right supporting website. (correct earlier today but may have changed.) Link to full document...
You know that Guido Fawkes is a right wing conservative who has previously actually been paid to campaign on behalf of Boris Johnson right?
So Johnson's Brexit isn't predicated on reaching a trade agreement with the US? And the US haven't indicated that pharma and access to the NHS are issues they want to be part of that agreement? Which is why Johnson can't take those issues of the table given how vital that deal would be?
I'm abit.on the fence with all the political stuff, some on here class them selfs as labour members/voters others seem to be more right wing. I'm not Corbyn's biggest fan but I will say one thing johnson is a racist, with the things he has said in the past I could never vote for him and I cant understand why the press hasn't picked up on it or there has been no inquiry into this.
I don't understand this either. As well as what Terry has posted above, he has said that being scared of Islam is a 'natural reaction' and that we need to 'accept that the problem is Islam. Islam is the problem.' He also said 'when is someone going to get 18th century on Islam's medieval ass?' He said that walking past a group of black kids makes him 'turn a hair'. When referring to colonialism and Africa he said 'the problem is not that we were once in charge, but that we are not in charge anymore'. He was editor at the Spectator and allowed Taki's writing to be published that said: 'Orientals ... have larger brains and higher IQ scores. Blacks are at the other pole.' And that described black American bastketball players as having "arms hanging below their knees and tongues sticking out". He's a disgusting racist, homophobe and misogynist.
Barry Gardner as just been on with Clunks and Trickys hero Andrew Neil all I'm going to say is Gardner 1 Neil 0.
How does that make any difference to the content of the unredacted document that repudiates Corbyn's allegations?