New Home Secretary if Labour somehow get in? [emoji3064]FML!! Can’t even put her shoes on properly!

Congratulations

 

That

first picture is definitely not a photoshop from the second, too many differences for it to be same.
I also have to say whilst not condoning tactics like using the original for propaganda, the rag that writes the article wants reporting. To suggest using the picture in such way is rascist is wrong and unfounded.

 

Regardless of whether the picture is accurate or not, to vote using something like this as a reason is utterly retarded.

 

Ermmm, I didn't imply that the first picture was a photoshop of the second, I said the first picture was fake. The second picture was obviously taken in a different position but she's wearing the same clothes and the shoe on her left foot is the same in both pictures, screams fake all day.

 

Stop flirting you two

 

You seem to be a nasty individual, but then again looking at your occupation, nothing more can be said.

 

Problem is you're the ignorant on here. Ignorant of the facts..Show me absolute evidence of JC being a terrorist sympathiser. Answer :- many have tried non succeeded.

 

Actually you said photoshopped, but I accept you meant it was fake.
I also don’t doubt it was fake either.

 

Jeremy who?

 

Lol! I think you’ll find someone insulted me first so I responded in kind. I will not suffer silently by being publicly slandered on here hence my retort that you seem to have only picked up on sadly.
So I guess your anti-military then? Ah well...

Again, you seem to be yet another ignorant individual who doesn’t even know who I am and has never met me, Yet chastises without knowledge of me and it seems, without reading the thread thoroughly that led to my curt response to that individual?
To call me a nasty individual is a little slanderous given the anonymity we have to one another don’t you think on reflection?

The thread and picture was all over the media with no hint that it was faked if indeed it was. I formed an opinion given the media press as most on here do. The plain facts are that because the labour voting majority on here seem to take immediate umbrage at anything uttered against that particular party it’s then apparently free reign to hurl abuse at the OP.

Very sad indeed and says more about those that immediately responded on here with targeted personal unsubstantiated and totally incorrect retard insults, than it does about my own response to them to which they deserved.

 

Quite a few anti military on here mate, I got accused of joining the army knowing I would be sent into conflict also knowing i would be MURDERING innocent people, WTF, saying that knowing Corblimey is/ as gone makes it more palatable.

 

It's hard to take the moral high ground when you've A. Become a hypocrite in regards to publicly slandering people with unsubstantiated documents and B. Jumped on the bandwagon of something that turned out to be fake and then failed to retract anything you've said on the matter.

 

Not military, nor have I ever been, but I don’t understand why anyone would be anti military.
I can understand people who believe in Peace and there being a better way etc.
In reality people in the Military are ‘just following orders’ set out by the people we all vote for.

Very few I would hazard ever joined thinking I want to shoot someone, to most it’s a means to an end, a way to be able to better themselves create a career path likely to be unavailable to them in the public domain.

 

On the nail that mate, wish some shared your mindset on here.

 

Ive never experienced any anti military bias, posts or personal insults. I’ve been posting on this board in one form of another since 1999.

I often find the people on here of any political pursuance the most generous, funny and dependable.

They are also anti idiot, anti stupid, anti intolerant and anti open mindfulness. They don’t tolerate fools gladly in any situation or topic.

still, you keep wakning him off thinking you are being picked on.

 

Me also, where is this anti military stuff Portsmouth tykes speaks of?

 

Ah, but I never resorted to personal insults of other bbs members without justification, I.e. Ill founded retard comments directed towards me that I gave back with interest as was my right.
I posted what was fed on a plethora of news posts, nothing more so your snipe at me just now for being hypocritical is hardly the same now is it?
Had it been about Boris Johnson or any of his MPs I dare say it would’ve been roundly applauded on here, call me a cynic

 

You're not wrong calling anyone that is disgusting really.

 

So you are inferring I am all those things? You are fast becoming the most ignorant member I’ve come across on here, fact!
Again, for want of not becoming a stuck record, you latch onto anything I utter and try to twist and spin your ignorant opinions around it. You say plenty of nonesense yourself fella much like your blatant personal inferrance quote above tbh that I usually don’t feel the need to belittle because I’m above tit for tat, that’s usually when it’s not aimed at me specifically. I find you a very twisted individual indeed tbh.

 

Wnaking who off ??
Who's being picked on ? I haven't heard that since about 1983, but I certainly dont call it being picked on because someones mindset or opinion is different from my own.
Just because you haven't seen it it doesn't mean it wasn't posted