Birmingham have got off their charge

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by Dragon Tyke, Jun 11, 2020.

  1. Dragon Tyke

    Dragon Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    18,566
    Likes Received:
    5,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Saint Athan
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
  2. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,306
    Likes Received:
    29,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    What the f is the point in the EFL spending money challenging a ruling only to win the case and elect not to punish the offender in the first place.
    The EFL really needs disbanding.
     
    anstonred, Jamo, TonyTyke and 2 others like this.
  3. Tarntyke

    Tarntyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Messages:
    14,886
    Likes Received:
    13,093
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Stairfoot, b4 famous rahnderbart
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    To remind us they are in charge, what they say goes, apart from when it suits. Integrity indeed. Oh, and carry on breaking our FFP rules, if you want.
     
    anstonred and Redhelen like this.
  4. MexboroughTyke

    MexboroughTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,543
    Likes Received:
    3,886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    I don’t get why they bother. If you’re going to have a rule, penalise teams that break them, otherwise just let everybody spend as they please.

    I’m sure there are plenty of clauses that teams, like Birmingham, use to attempt to get away with it, but you just know if we broke the rules we’d be penalised without hesitation. They don’t really seem to apply the same rules to all.
     
  5. Ged

    Geddiswasguud Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2014
    Messages:
    4,682
    Likes Received:
    4,401
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Disgraceful
     
    Redblueunwhite and Redhelen like this.
  6. lk3

    lk311 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2016
    Messages:
    9,562
    Likes Received:
    7,776
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    They didn’t get off their charge?
    The article says the EFL won the appeal.
    It also says the charge was not for breach of FFP but for failing to follow the agreed plan following the last breach.
     
  7. Brush

    Brush Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    16,955
    Likes Received:
    15,940
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Ex-IT professional
    Location:
    Swadlincote, South Derbyshire
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Why am I not surprised.....
     
  8. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,306
    Likes Received:
    29,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Well no they've not got off the charge the EFL just decided to say 'guilty but no punishment' which is absolutely ridiculous
     
    anstonred likes this.
  9. lk3

    lk311 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2016
    Messages:
    9,562
    Likes Received:
    7,776
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It wasn’t EFL, it was an independent tribunal. They were found guilty of not following an agreed plan, I’m not sure there was ever an option to deduct points for that.
     
    Redhelen likes this.
  10. Redhelen

    Redhelen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2018
    Messages:
    37,636
    Likes Received:
    44,105
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Maybe they need to close that loophole though. Not much point in having a punishment plan, and there being no deterrent for not sticking to it.
     
    anstonred, TitusMagee and lk311 like this.
  11. HarpStaysSharp

    HarpStaysSharp Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2018
    Messages:
    184
    Likes Received:
    169
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    As you say ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS.
    Not really surprising though, EFL again showing total lack of concern for those 'playing by the rules'.

    Shame that our owners won't think sod the rules and put lots of £££,£££,£££'s in next season - can but dream...
     
  12. Red

    Redblueunwhite Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    6,290
    Likes Received:
    6,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    But poor little old Macclesfield can keep getting points docked at the drop of an hat.
     
  13. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,306
    Likes Received:
    29,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I thought it was the EFL who charged them, the tribunal overruled the decision in Birmingham's favour and the EFL submitted an appeal which they've won.
    I just don't understand how there can be, as part of the original punishment, restrictions on player signings set out in a plan only for the club to ignore said plan without any punishment. It seems that stating a plan must be followed with restrictions and then charging the club with failing to follow that plan is all a complete waste of time if there is then no punishment.
     
    anstonred likes this.
  14. pompey_red

    pompey_red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Messages:
    13,539
    Likes Received:
    9,582
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Fareham
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Football authorities are fuckjng corrupt. Absolute jokes from top to bottom
     
  15. Hooky feller

    Hooky feller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2016
    Messages:
    17,642
    Likes Received:
    20,108
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Retired, full time grandad.
    Location:
    Mapp.
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Baffling. Maybe Birmingham could have avoided the costs of the independent tribunal. If they’d known of the outcome.
    Easily
    Fkin
    Led
     
  16. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,306
    Likes Received:
    29,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I've come to the conclusion that the EFL must have been in charge of deciding whether or not to punish Dominic Cummings
     
  17. Che

    Chef Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    19,552
    Likes Received:
    12,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    West Stand Bogs
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley
    the whole game is corrupt sadly
     
  18. lk3

    lk311 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2016
    Messages:
    9,562
    Likes Received:
    7,776
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Yep you got in it in one, absolutely pointless (no pun intended).
     
  19. Men

    Menai Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    10,654
    Likes Received:
    7,377
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Earth
    Style:
    Barnsley
    That’s alright then I guess.......

    Why do we bother working inside FFP clubs who work within the rules are the only teams punished by it.
     
  20. lk3

    lk311 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2016
    Messages:
    9,562
    Likes Received:
    7,776
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    They were punished they got a 9 point deduction for the failure of FFP.
    This was for failing to sell players quick enough, which they were instructed to do by the EFL to balance their books.
    As frustrating as it is there is not a rule to deduct points for failing to follow a plan, I agree with others that the loophole should be closed
     

Share This Page