Court Case / Move from Oakwell - Further BFCST Update

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by Gally, Sep 16, 2020.

  1. Spi

    Spirit of 81 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2016
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    241
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The extent to which any covenant is easily identifiable depends on whether the land is registered at HM Land Registry. Registration has been mandatory upon a sale of property for many decades. When you buy a residential property it is almost certain to be registered land and all the solicitor needs to do its look at the relevant registered title at the land registry. Land which has not changed ownership fora long time may be unregistered. Keep in mind that a sale of shares in a company which owns land is not a sale of the land itself, so this would not trigger any activity at the Land Registry. Where land is unregistered the solicitor needs to review all the deeds to establish ownership of the property and identify covenant and other encumbrances.

    In a corporate transaction like the takeover of the club the vendor would usually make available a virtual data room Containing documents relevant to the transaction. It’s up to the purchase to decide which documents to review, whether to ask for more etc.
     
  2. lk3

    lk311 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2016
    Messages:
    9,564
    Likes Received:
    7,777
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    No way a man like Chien goes into a deal worth millions without having his team go through it with a fine tooth comb.
    Given the size of his company, I would expect he either has employed Solicitors or at worst retained ones.
     
  3. Fon

    Fonzie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2012
    Messages:
    9,336
    Likes Received:
    15,949
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    There's one easy way for Mr Conway to end all this negative speculation about him and his colleagues.

    To make an honest statement about the current situation.

    The more time that fans are left to speculate then the more we argue amongst ourselves and end up turning on each other.

    With the record of our board though, I'm not sure a statement will be forthcoming - unless it's to the Scottish Press about the purchase of another club.
     
  4. Che

    Chef Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    19,555
    Likes Received:
    12,573
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    West Stand Bogs
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Thanks Paul,

    this argument about the RC sounds like complete and utter ******** to me

    I think @mansfield_red ’s supposition above sounds fairly likely
     
    DannyWilsonLovechild likes this.
  5. orsenkaht

    orsenkaht Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Messages:
    11,868
    Likes Received:
    11,662
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Oakwell (and surrounding land) appears to have transferred to OCAL in the financial year ending 31 March 2004. One assumes that registration would have occurred then at the latest, if registration had not taken place before. It's common of course for the Property Register section of the register of title to state that the transfer takes place subject to any specified retained easements or restrictive covenants recited in an earlier conveyance of the land, so far as they are capable of subsisting and taking effect. So that still leaves open the question of enforceability of the earlier covenants, such as they are. But it may be that BMBC would not wish to be party to overriding the earlier covenants or may even wish to re-state or reinforce the covenants in any sale of it's 50% interest to Lee/Conway et al (see my earlier post at #18). The Crynes may feel that the covenants are unenforceable, but BMBC may take a different view, and may even be determined to ensure that they are reinforced and made enforceable by any disposal of it's 50% interest. Easy to see how that would be a sticking point for Lee/Conway etc.
     
  6. Hykehamtyke

    Hykehamtyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2013
    Messages:
    2,078
    Likes Received:
    740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    HM Forces
    Location:
    Lincoln
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Stadium maintenance? Really? Must be the driers in the bogs again
     
  7. orsenkaht

    orsenkaht Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Messages:
    11,868
    Likes Received:
    11,662
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    But it may not be minor for BMBC. They may even wish to revive the covenant!
     
  8. Mr Badger

    Mr Badger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    10,010
    Likes Received:
    8,510
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Fillingham
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Are we saying that this restrictive covenant, and whatever/whoever it involves, and the "third party" are one and the same?
    It appears that the Crynes are happy to sell their 50% but are also held back by the covenant.
    It seems that the 80%ers are saying to the Crynes, get this covenant sorted or we are done and will move the footballing side elsewhere. Oh, and by the way, contribute to the high maintenance costs cos we owe you 2.75m and you won't get any of it until you do.
     
  9. Idi

    Idioteque1988 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2008
    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    230
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    North Ferriby
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Just to put in my bit on the maintenance costs/rent scenario. (I am manager of a UK Arena/multi purpose events space)

    There are two standard agreement types when it comes to operation of a stadium/venue - either the operating company pay rent and costs, or they are paid to operate the venue and pay costs. In either instance they take a percentage of the profits from activity in the space, obviously a larger cut in the event of the rent paying option.

    Oakwell to me seems a very unattractive proposition. The catering is on a concession contract, the opportunity for other events is very limited as the conferencing space isn't particularly impressive, and all stands are aging to various degrees so I can believe a 1m operating cost (although I suspect this covers contracted and general reactive works to the site, and not just the stadium). The profit percentage on operation is going to be very inefficient given the high costs of operating a club.

    If we look at another example, the KCOM in Hull is operated by a company run by the owner, and they receive a payment from the council for doing this.

    If I were the owners I'd want to make sure my money wasn't being used to improve somebody else's asset, so naturally would want to buy the venue. I can't comment on the legalities regarding the covenant, however I suspect they may be concerned at the effect it would have on future sale, value, and ability to do other licensable activity beyond football on the site.

    I do think the council need to reassess what is perhaps an unfairly weighted deal if they want to stave off this threat (and I suspect that is the owners intention) - given the 9 year term remaining. Again, these deals usually have 5 year break clauses in them but I'm assuming this one doesn't or else it would have come up last year.
     
  10. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,312
    Likes Received:
    29,377
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The size of which company though? His main registered company that I could find has just one employee. Him.
     
    Redhelen likes this.
  11. Cod Eye

    Cod Eye Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,440
    Likes Received:
    2,213
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    This covenant that seems to be the big issue, is it the rumoured "ransom strip" that someone kept when gifting the land to the club originally? If so, then I thought it only applied while for 2 generations of the owners family were still alive(would that be their great, great grandkids?). If so, then it would be very simple for the Crynes to pay a solicitor to find out if a)they are still alive(proving BFC have nothing to worry about), and b)if they are still alive, see if they would waive it/sell it(meaning the club have nothing to worry about). With the money the Cryne family stand to make from the sale, the investment in a solicitor would be well worth it to them.

    It would also show the world that it is the club's majority owners that are the villains of the piece if they still carried on playing silly buggers after it is proved beyond doubt that there is nothing legally stopping them buying the ground...
     
  12. Jimmy viz

    Jimmy viz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Messages:
    29,684
    Likes Received:
    19,158
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballet Dancer
    Location:
    Hiding under the bed
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Man alive if I knew about this covenant 20 years ago I’m sure some swanky mcswanky lawyers uncovered it whilst negotiating a multi million pound deal. When JD told me about it he said it was unenforceable then and that he had never really had to consider it because what else would you use Oakwell for other than sport.
     
  13. Stephen Dawson

    Stephen Dawson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2018
    Messages:
    36,221
    Likes Received:
    30,987
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The Cryne's have already done this.
     
    Redhelen likes this.
  14. Stephen Dawson

    Stephen Dawson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2018
    Messages:
    36,221
    Likes Received:
    30,987
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Mentioned it on another thread. It's a combative measure by the new owners to wriggle out of paying what's owed.
     
  15. Loko the Tyke

    Loko the Tyke Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2005
    Messages:
    16,668
    Likes Received:
    17,691
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I think, but don't know for sure, that there might be either one covenant that has a bit more to it than what you've described above. Or the one you've mentioned plus another that is about third party interest. Basically, there's more to it than it just being protected for the use of sport.
     
  16. Stephen Dawson

    Stephen Dawson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2018
    Messages:
    36,221
    Likes Received:
    30,987
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Is it possible that John Dennis bought some of the land before the club entered admin and it was only the footballing side that went down the toilet?
     
  17. Loko the Tyke

    Loko the Tyke Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2005
    Messages:
    16,668
    Likes Received:
    17,691
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Not sure on that. I think the covenant provides a legitimate concern that the ground can be purchased by a third party. As in the statement from the Trust, the Cryne Family have had QC assurance that isn't the case but we're not progressing with the purchase at present based on that.
     
  18. Redhelen

    Redhelen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2018
    Messages:
    37,637
    Likes Received:
    44,105
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    As I understand it, covenenants that are deemed to be unfairly restrictive can be easily overturned, especially as time goes on. I think it very wrong of the 80% owners to backtrack on the money they agreed to pay for the sale of the club. It must make the day to day working relationship very difficult.
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2020
  19. Ext

    Extremely Northern Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    11,753
    Likes Received:
    1,949
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Professional Northerner.
    Location:
    Preparing for the 4th division
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Thanks Gally.

    So potentially £16 million quid PLUS the land for a club that we are continually told is lowest budget, lowest payer, lowest crowds etc ?

    pmsl

    What was it bought out of admin for ? £3.5m ?

    See ya
     
  20. Gally

    Gally Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    Messages:
    17,044
    Likes Received:
    12,613
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    York
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley
    No :)
     

Share This Page