Yikes! What sort of person would do that and would you trust them with anything sharp? EDIT: https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money...le-2018111/Buying-title-Lord-Is-worth-it.html In summary though that sort of 'title ' is worthless you are still Mr. Lord xxxx. In summary It is illegal to use your bought title on legal documents. Manorial lordships cost many thousands of pounds
They do Helen, you have to click on people and then persons with significant control. Also if you look in the filings you can see them.
Im not saying they have like, but only that it’s a possibility.... It looks from the statutory submissions they changed from Mr and Mrs to Lord and Lady around 2016; I mean one of them might have got a peerage but equally they might just have bought the titles for hilarious rofls.
As per my post above if they bought one for of those then they are breaking the law as they cannot use them on legal documents only an expensive Manorial title would allow that. EDIT: Checked and there is no peerage other than a Labour peer of a similar name but obviously a different person
I honestly don't think that's right mate. I think you can legitimately change your name on legal documents - well, you can according to this: https://elitetitles.co.uk/faq.html
is it false ?????, i am currently looking into buying a peerage for my grandson ( sealand) so he can be known as ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' i understand he has no house of lords rights and its only an on paper title but he can still use the title "lord" he's 6 by the way and its only £30
Those were my thoughts. Normally mineral rights (apart from some statutory rights such as coal) go with the freehold. I am bemused somebody thought it was worthwhile to hive them off but preserve the rights of the existing owner at the same time as the club was being sold. I've only ever seen them treated separately once before and that was on a stone quarry. Btw you can go on companies House website and spin up a company calling yourself Mickey mouse if you want to. There's noone to check it.
You could use them to bribe somebody to leave a property or sell it cheaper. However, if that person had any gumption they'd tell you to **** off lol
Just a guess this but may it give them an entitlement to bid for the land as and when it is sold? My thoughts are that they don’t want the land but by effectively ‘running inference’ would be looking for a back hander to go away? Amounts to legalised blackmail I stress again that this is purely guesswork and most likely complete nonsense
Someone has been very cute if they’ve bought the mineral rights to Oakwell, it basically means that if the site was ever sold for redevelopment; which I’m ever more convinced is the owners intention, then whoever developed it would have to compensate the owner of the mineral underneath which would be sterilized by the redevelopment. So the motivation is either a clever opportunity to make a fast buck, or an equally clever way of preventing the ground ever being attractive enough to a developer given the compensation element. Plot thickens.
A recent former owner of BFC was heavily involved in the oil and gas industry. But this was some time before 2017 tbf.
There are underground streams and water courses underneath the Oakwell site. Earlier in this century it caused a sink hole at the northern end of the ground behind the West stand.
This time next year, Chien Lee will walk into Guardiola’s office and throw a big bag of diamonds on the table “this enough for Sterling pal”